Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments

  title={Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments},
  author={David W. Nickerson},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  pages={49 - 57}
Members of the same household share similar voting behaviors on average, but how much of this correlation can be attributed to the behavior of the other person in the household? Disentangling and isolating the unique effects of peer behavior, selection processes, and congruent interests is a challenge for all studies of interpersonal influence. This study proposes and utilizes a carefully designed placebo-controlled experimental protocol to overcome this identification problem. During a face-to… 

Identification and sensitivity analysis of contagion effects in randomized placebo‐controlled trials

  • K. ImaiZhichao Jiang
  • Economics
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)
  • 2019
In social science research, interference between units is the rule rather than the exception. Contagion represents one key causal mechanism of such spillover effects, where one's treatment affects

University of Birmingham Sharing partisanship, household norms and turnout:

Previous research shows that the household context is a crucial source of in fl uence on turnout. This article sets out a relational theory of voting in which turnout is dependent on the existence of

Assortative mating and turnout: a self-reinforcing pattern of unequal voting participation

Abstract Previous research finds that privileged citizens have more influence on democratic decisions than less advantaged citizens. One explanation put forward is unequal voting participation

How costly is voting? Explaining individual differences in the costs of voting

ABSTRACT A more profound analysis of the variables in the voting equation is needed to improve our knowledge on voting. In this paper, we endogenize the costs of voting (C) and test several models

Are Voters More Likely to Contribute to Other Public Goods? Evidence from a Large‐Scale Randomized Policy Experiment

Voting has been described as a contribution to a public good. Are people who vote frequently therefore more likely to contribute to other public goods? Does partisanship affect how likely a person is

Social Pressure, Descriptive Norms, and Voter Mobilization

Several recent field experimental studies show that social pressure raises the likelihood of turning out to vote in elections. Ratcheting up social pressure to show subjects their own as well as

Social Pressure, Descriptive Norms, and Voter Mobilization

Several recent field experimental studies show that social pressure raises the likelihood of turning out to vote in elections. Ratcheting up social pressure to show subjects their own as well as

Widowhood Effects in Voter Participation

Past research suggests that spouses influence one another to vote, but it relies almost exclusively on correlation in turnout. It is therefore difficult to establish whether spouses mobilize each

Voting in Clientelistic Social Networks: Evidence From the Philippines*

In clientelistic environments, voters want to know which politicians are most likely to deliver on targeted benefits. We argue that in these contexts, voters use their social proximity with

Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments

Many political observers view get-out-the-vote (GOTV) mobilization drives as a way to increase turnout among chronic nonvoters. However, such a strategy assumes that GOTV efforts are effective at



Turnout in a Small World

This article investigates between-voter interactions in a social network model of turnout. It shows that if 1) there is a small probability that voters imitate the behavior of one of their

The vanishing voter : public involvement in an age of uncertainty

During the presidential election of 2000, Thomas E. Patterson, a political scientist and voter-turnout specialist who had recently moved from the University of Minnesota to Harvard’s Kennedy School

Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence

Political discussion during an election campaign is an important vehicle of social influence--a means whereby the preferences of individuals are brought into correspondence with political

Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California

Using randomized experimentation, this study of a municipal election in Central California examines the effects of face-to-face canvassing on voter turnout. This is the first randomized experiment to

Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments

Prior to the November 6, 2001 elections, randomized voter mobilization experiments were conducted in Bridgeport, Columbus, Detroit, Minneapolis, Raleigh, and St. Paul. Names appearing on official

Interpersonal Influence in Election Campaigns Two Step-flow Hypotheses

Research subsequent to the classic statement of a two-step flow-of-influence hy- pothesis has isolated a number of inaccuracies in the hypothesis as originally formulated. Analysis of a question

The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices

Voting choices are a product of both personal attitudes and social contexts, of a personal and a social calculus. Research has illuminated the personal calculus of voting, but the social calculus has

A strategic calculus of voting

ConclusionThere are several major insights which this game theoretic analysis has produced. First, we have shown that equilibria exist with substantial turnout even when both the majority is much

The Microenvironment of Attitude Change

Studies of social influence have suffered from limitations in available data resources. Consequently, they usually have either failed to consider the dynamic nature of attitudes or have specified the

Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem

This paper examines the reflection problem that arises when a researcher observing the distribution of behaviour in a population tries to infer whether the average behaviour in some group influences