• Corpus ID: 209500534

Is QBism a Possible Solution to the Conceptual Problems of Quantum Mechanics

  title={Is QBism a Possible Solution to the Conceptual Problems of Quantum Mechanics},
  author={Herv{\'e} Zwirn},
  journal={arXiv: Quantum Physics},
  • H. Zwirn
  • Published 25 December 2019
  • Philosophy
  • arXiv: Quantum Physics
QBism is a recently developed version of Quantum Bayesianism. QBists think that the primitive concept of experience is the central subject of science. QBism refuses the idea that the quantum state of a system is an objective description of this system. It is a tool for assigning a subjective probability to the agent's future experience. So quantum mechanics does not directly say something about the "external world". A measurement (in the usual sense) is just a special case of what QBism calls… 
A discrepancy between the instrumentalist and the realist inclinations of QBism, or between its experiential and interactional concepts of measurement, has been repeatedly noticed. Here, we show that
Conceptual variables, quantum theory, and statistical inference theory
The simple consequences of an epistemic interpretation for some so called quantum paradoxes are discussed, and connections to statistical inference theory are discussed in a preliminary way, both through an example and through a brief discussion of quantum measurement theory.
Is the Past Determined?
Convivial Solipsism shows that even if, in the usual sense, there is no physical effect of the present or of the future on the past, the authors must nevertheless consider that the observer's past is sometimes not entirely determined and that it becomes determined only when certain measurements are done latter.
Considering Measurement Dynamics In Classical Mechanics
Following this line of thinking about the two systems as intertwined/coupled, in the classical picture, naturally leads to the general dynamics analogous to Schrodinger’s wave dynamics.


QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
This article summarizes the Quantum Bayesian point of view of quantum mechanics, with special emphasis on the view's outer edges---dubbed QBism. QBism has its roots in personalist Bayesian
Two Dogmas About Quantum Mechanics
We argue that the intractable part of the measurement problem -- the 'big' measurement problem -- is a pseudo-problem that depends for its legitimacy on the acceptance of two dogmas. The first dogma
Quantum Measurement and the Paulian Idea
In the quantum Bayesian (or QBist) conception of quantum theory, "quantum measurement" is understood not as a comparison of something pre-existent with a standard, but instead indicative of the
Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism
Without Niels Bohr, QBism would be nothing. But QBism is not Bohr. This paper attempts to show that, despite a popular misconception, QBism is no minor tweak to Bohr's interpretation of quantum
Why I am not a QBist
This work states that QBists claim that most if not all conceptual problems of quantum mechanics vanish if the authors simply take a proper epistemic and probabilistic perspective, and explains why this judgement is largely subjective and logically consistent.
On the Quantum Measurement Problem
In this paper, I attempt a personal account of my understanding of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, which has been largely in the tradition of the Copenhagen interpretation. I assume
The Measurement Problem: Decoherence and Convivial Solipsism
This paper examines the arguments that have been given for and against both interpretations and defends a new position, the “Convivial Solipsism”, according to which the outcome that is observed is relative to the observer, different but in close parallel to the Everett's interpretation and sharing also some similarities with Rovelli's relational interpretation and Quantum Bayesianism.
Quantum-Bayesian Coherence
It is argued that the Born Rule should be seen as an empirical addition to Bayesian reasoning itself, and how to view it as a normative rule in addition to usual Dutch-book coherence is shown.
QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality
In QBism (or quantum Bayesianism) a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality but an agentʼs personal probability assignments, reflecting his subjective degrees of belief about
Decoherence and the measurement problem
The problem of measurement taken at face value shows clearly that there is an inconsistency inside the quantum formalism. The phenomenon of decoherence is often presented as a solution to it. A