Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive

@inproceedings{Kock2008IsPR,
  title={Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive},
  author={Christian Kock},
  year={2008}
}
Douglas Walton has done extensive and valuable work on the concepts of presumption and practical reasoning. However, Walton’s attempt to model practical reasoning as presumptive is misguided. The notions of “inference” and of the burden of proof shifting back and forth between proponent and respondent are misleading and lead to counterintuitive consequences. Because the issue in practical reasoning is a proposal, not a proposition, there are, in the standard case, several perfectly good reasons… CONTINUE READING

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES

How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue

D. N. Walton
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law. DOI 10.1007/s10506-006-9025-x. 63 pp.
  • 2006

A rhetoric of argument. (Third edition.) Boston: McGraw-Hill

J. Fahnestock, M. Secor
  • 2004
VIEW 1 EXCERPT

Commentary on C

R. C. Pinto
  • Reed & D. Walton’s “Argumentation Schemes in Argument-as-Process and Argument-as-Product”. In J.A. Blair, D. Farr, H.V. Hansen, R.H. Johnson and C.W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
  • 2003
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS

Gravity too is relative: On the logic of deliberative debate

C. Kock
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A., & Henkemans, A. F. S. (Eds.). Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (pp. 627-632). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  • 2003
VIEW 1 EXCERPT