Is Peer Review in Decline?

  title={Is Peer Review in Decline?},
  author={Glenn Ellison},
  journal={Economics of Networks eJournal},
  • Glenn Ellison
  • Published 1 July 2007
  • Economics, Political Science
  • Economics of Networks eJournal
Over the past decade there has been a decline in the fraction of papers in top economics journals written by economists from the highest-ranked economics departments. This paper documents this fact and uses additional data on publications and citations to assess various potential explanations. Several observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the Internet improves the ability of high-profile authors to disseminate their research without going through the traditional peer-review… 
How Does the Market Use Citation Data? The Hirsch Index in Economics
A large literature following Hirsch (2005) has proposed citation-based indexes that could be used to rank academics. This paper examines how well several such indexes match labor market outcomes
Can We Test for Bias in Scientific Peer-Review?
Science rests upon the reliability of peer review. This paper suggests a way to test for bias. It is able to avoid the fallacy – one seen in the popular press and the research literature – that to
Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five
This paper examines the relationship between placement of publications in Top Five (T5) journals and receipt of tenure in academic economics departments. Analyzing the job histories of tenure-track
Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five
This paper examines the relationship between placement of publications in Top Five (T5) journals and receipt of tenure in academic economics departments. Analyzing the job histories of tenure-track
Publishing Trends in Economics across Colleges and Universities, 1991–2007
There is good reason to think that non-elite programs in economics may be producing relatively more research than in the past: research expectations have been ramped-up and new information
The Remarkable Growth in Financial Economics, 1974-2020
Academic finance has grown and evolved in the 46 years since the Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) began publishing papers. This paper uses detailed data on the 2,858 papers written by 3,152
A Model of the Academic Review Process with Informed Authors
Abstract Research on the academic review process may help to improve research productivity. The article presents a model of the review process in a top journal, in which authors know their paper’s
Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?
Presenting data on all full-length articles published in the three top general economics journals for one year in each of the 1960s through 2010s, I analyze how patterns of co-authorship, age
The Ultimate Irrelevance Proposition in Finance?
I survey 457 published papers in top Finance journals across two decades to assess whether they misuse tests of significance. Over 80% of published studies are diligent about distinguishing between
Do Economics Departments Improve after They Appoint a Top Scholar as Chairperson?
There has been almost no research into what makes an effective chairperson in a university department. This paper constructs a historical longitudinal dataset on economics departments in 58 US


Getting Noticed in Economics: The Determinants of Academic Citations
Academics strive for citations, but there has been little work done to identify the determinants of citations, primarily due to a lack of usable data. This paper uses new data to confirm the
Collaboration and the quality of economics research
Abstract This paper examines the widely held, but untested, belief that researchers who collaborate produce higher quality research than those who are sole-authors. All the articles published in 1990
The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process
Over the last three decades there has been a dramatic slowdown of the publication process at top economics journals. A substantial part is due to journals' requiring more extensive revisions. Various
Differences in impact factor across fields and over time
From 1994-2005, the average impact factor of journals listed by the ISI has been increasing by an average of 2.6 percent per year and this paper documents this growth and explores its causes.
Free Labor for Costly Journals
Commercial publishers charge libraries about 6 times as much per page and 16 times as much per citation as nonprofit journals. The paper presents evidence that successful for profit journals are
The Review Process in Economics: Is it Too Fast?
Rewards for publications in good economics journals are very high, and submission fees and other monetary costs associated with submitting an existing manuscript are low. Consequently, the editorial
The Slowdown in First-Response Times of Economics Journals: Can it Be Beneficial?
The first response time (henceforth FRT) of economics journals has increased over the last four decades from 1-2 months to 3-6 months, which has increased because of the availability of research on the Internet prior to publication and because the costs of refereeing a paper have increased.
The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics
The citations of doctorates in economics (who received the degree between 1950 and 1955) from six major universities are analyzed for articles published in the period 1950-68 in the two fields of
Publishing Economics: Analyses of the Academic Journal Market in Economics
Part 1 Success and rejection in economics: life among the econ, Axel Leijonhufvud the young economist's guide to professional etiquette, Daniel Hamermesh how are the mighty fallen - rejected classic
Academic Journal Pricing and the Demand of Libraries
The prices of for-profit academic journals have increased rapidly over the past decade (Barbara Albee and Brenda Dingley, 2001). There remains substantial debate as to the explanation for these