Is Justified True Belief Knowledge

  title={Is Justified True Belief Knowledge},
  author={Edmund L. Gettier},
Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author. 
Borges Scoops Gettier
Edmund Gettier's famous 1963 paper "Is Justified, True Belief Knowledge?" has had an enormous impact on epistemology. What has not been acknowledged to date is that Argentine author Jorge Luis BorgesExpand
How Believing Can Fail to Be Knowing
This paper defends a simple, externalist account of knowledge, incorporating familiar conditions men- tioned in the literature, and responds to Timothy Williamson's charge that any such analysis isExpand
MisleAding dispositions And the VAlue of Knowledge
Gettiered beliefs are those whose agents are sub - ject to the kind of epistemologically significant luck illustrated by Gettier Cases. Provided that knowledge requires ungettiered belief, we canExpand
The maturation of the Gettier problem
Edmund Gettier�s paper �Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?� first appeared in an issue of Analysis (Vol. 23, No. 6), dated June of 1963, and although it�s tempting (and common) to wax hyperbolicExpand
Getting Over Gettier
For centuries tradition had it that knowledge is justified true belief. Then Edmund Gettier produced cases that refute that traditional view – or so most philosophers think. I disagree. TheExpand
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge
1. W EAK K NOWLEDGE I S M ERE T RUE B ELIEF It is a widely accepted doctrine in epistemology that knowledge has greater value than mere true belief. But although epistemologists regularly pay homageExpand
Armstrong’s Theory of Knowing
Reliabilist theories of epistemic justification dominate the current epistemological scene, and this is due in large part to Professor Armstrong’s powerful and influential1 book, Belief Truth andExpand
Testimony, Knowledge, and Epistemic Goals
Various considerations are adduced toshow that we require that a testifier know hertestimony. Such a requirement apparentlyimproves testimony. It is argued that the aimof improving testimony explainsExpand
Knowledge entails dispositional belief
Knowledge is widely thought to entail belief. But Radford has claimed to offer a counterexample: the case of the unconfident examinee. And Myers-Schulz and Schwitzgebel have claimed empiricalExpand
Is knowledge justified true belief?
  • J. Turri
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2010
A crucial improvement to the traditional view is proposed, relying on an intuitive and independently plausible metaphysical distinction pertaining to the manifestation of intellectual powers, which supplements the traditional components of justification, truth and belief. Expand


The Problem of Knowledge (London, 1956)
  • 1956
Plato seems to be considering some such definition at Theaetetus 20 I, and perhaps accepting one at Meno 98
  • Plato seems to be considering some such definition at Theaetetus 20 I, and perhaps accepting one at Meno 98