• DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(309)
• Corpus ID: 73635900

Is Impervious Cover Still Important? Review of Recent Research

@article{Schueler2009IsIC,
  title={Is Impervious Cover Still Important? Review of Recent Research},
  author={Thomas R. Schueler and Lisa Fraley-McNeal and Karen Cappiella},
  journal={Journal of Hydrologic Engineering},
  year={2009},
  volume={14},
  pages={309-315}
}

• Thomas R. Schueler, L. Fraley-McNeal, Karen Cappiella
• Published 1 April 2009
• Engineering
• Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

The impervious cover model (ICM) has attracted considerable attention in recent years, with nearly 250 research studies testing its basic hypothesis that the behavior of urban stream indicators can be predicted on the basis of the percent impervious cover in their contributing subwatershed. The writers conducted a meta-analysis of 65 new research studies that bear on the ICM to determine the degree to which they met the assumptions of the ICM and supported or did not support its primary predictions. Results show that the majority of research published since 2003 has confirmed or reinforced the basic premise of the ICM, but has also revealed important caveats and limitations to its application. A reformulated conceptual impervious cover model is presented in this paper that is strengthened to reflect the most recent science and simplify it for watershed managers and policy makers. A future challenge is to test the hypothesis that widespread application of multiple management practices at the catchment level can improve the urban stream degradation gradient that has been repeatedly observed by researchers across the country.