Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources

  title={Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources},
  author={Jan Brophy and David Bawden},
  journal={Aslib Proc.},
Purpose – The purpose of the study was to compare an internet search engine, Google, with appropriate library databases and systems, in order to assess the relative value, strengths and weaknesses of the two sorts of system. [] Key MethodDesign/methodology/approach – A case study approach was used, with detailed analysis and failure checking of results. The performance of the two systems was assessed in terms of coverage, unique records, precision, and quality and accessibility of results.

Figures and Tables from this paper

Increasing Libraries' Content Findability on the Web with Search Engine Optimization
The results show that certain websites' characteristics do have an effect on how well libraries' websites are ranked by search engines.
An Alternative to Existing Library Websites : Evaluation of Nine Start Pages using Criteria Extracted from Library Literature
This research evaluates nine internet start pages to determine whether they would be suitable for use in a library context. The methodology involved extracting ninety-six evaluation criteria from
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources
The study is the first to show the extent to which search systems can effectively and efficiently perform (Boolean) searches with regards to precision, recall, and reproducibility and to demonstrate why Google Scholar is inappropriate as principal search system.
Assessment of Search Interface of Information Retrieval Systems A Case Study of Select Academic Databases
  • Huma Shafiq, Zahid Ashraf Wani
  • Computer Science
    2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS)
  • 2018
The present study attempts to identify and assess features and facilities of search interface of seven prominent academic databases, i.e., Cambridge Journals, JSTOR, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley Online Library, to achieve the maximum exploitation of academic databases.
Google vs. the Library (Part III): Assessing the Quality of Sources Found by Undergraduates
This study assesses and compares the quality of sources found by undergraduate students when doing research using both Google and a library (federated) search tool. Thirty undergraduates were asked
An Analytical Study of Online Public Access Catalogues in Comparison with Features of Amazon and Google: A Checklist Approach
Recent researches in the field of cataloguingconfirmed that the library catalogue is losing its importance and its service cannot match the level of Google, Google Scholar, Google Books and Amazon.
A comparative analysis on digital libraries and academic search engines from the dual-route perspective
This study compares digital libraries and academic search engines in terms of information quality, source credibility and affinity in the dual-route model, which the authors believe presents a new lens for digital libraries research and practice alike.
Undergraduates' Preference between Web Search Engines and Reference Sources for Research Activities in Two Universities in South West Nigeria
The development of web search engines has provided an alternative for undergraduates to access the needed information for their research activities without utilising library resources, especially


Search En-gines for the World Wide Web: A Compara-tive Study and Evaluation Methodology
The authors of this study found that Alta Vista outperformed Excite and Lycos in both search facilities and retrieval performance although Lycos had the largest coverage of Web resources among the three Web search engines examined.
"I still like Google": University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web
The findings suggest that requirements of good OPAC interface design must be aggressively redefined in the face of new, Web-based standards of usability.
Online IR system evaluation: online databases versus Web search engines
  • H. Xie
  • Computer Science
    Online Inf. Rev.
  • 2004
While participants preferred the ease of use and intuitive interfaces of Web search engines, they also liked the credible and useful information offered by online databases, and implications for the design of IR systems are suggested.
Web Search Engines
This review looks briefly at the history of World Wide Web search engine development, considers the current state of affairs, and reflects on the future. Networked discovery tools have evolved along
Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google
Results show that commercial Internet search engines dominate students' information-seeking strategy and that students' perceptions of ease of use, success, time taken to search, and reasons for stopping a search are presented.
Seeking better Web searches.
How Internet users will soon benefit from improved search engines that deliver customized results is discussed, which will revolve around new business deals that greatly expand the online coverage of the huge amount of published materials, including text, video and audio, that computer users cannot currently access.
10 Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for a Library
The Biomedical Library will be going "live" with a program called TDnet, which will enable all users to search at the article level all full-text journals, that are subscribed to by the university libraries, across multiple full text databases.
Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison
Academic Research on the Internet: Options for Scholars and Libraries
This book discusses how to choose Wisely from an Expanding Spectrum of Options: Business Information and the Internet and some of the resources available.