Is Disclosure an Effective Cleansing Mechanism? The Dynamics of Compensation Peer Benchmarking

@article{Faulkender2012IsDA,
  title={Is Disclosure an Effective Cleansing Mechanism? The Dynamics of Compensation Peer Benchmarking},
  author={Michael W. Faulkender and J. Yang},
  journal={AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings (Archive)},
  year={2012}
}
  • Michael W. Faulkender, J. Yang
  • Published 2012
  • Business
  • AFA 2013 San Diego Meetings (Archive)
  • Firms routinely justify CEO compensation by benchmarking against companies with highly paid CEOs. We examine whether the 2006 regulatory requirement of disclosing compensation peers mitigated firms' opportunistic peer selection activities. We find that strategic peer benchmarking did not disappear after enhanced disclosure. In fact, it intensified at firms with low institutional ownership, low director ownership, low CEO ownership, busy boards, large boards, and non-intensive monitoring boards… CONTINUE READING
    86 Citations
    Mandatory Compensation Disclosure, CFO Pay, and Corporate Financial Reporting Practices
    • PDF
    The Consequences of Mandated Compensation Disclosure *
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 74 REFERENCES
    Information Disclosure and Corporate Governance
    • 224
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Are All CEOs above Average? An Empirical Analysis of Compensation Peer Groups and Pay Design
    • 207
    • Highly Influential
    Shareholder Activism and CEO Pay
    • 282
    • PDF
    The costs of intense board monitoring
    • 411
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups
    • 305
    • PDF
    Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation
    • 384
    • PDF
    Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance 1 The financial sup
    • 3,596
    • PDF
    The Effect of Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation
    • 52
    • PDF