Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences?

@article{Zhou2007IsCA,
  title={Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences?},
  author={Ping Zhou and Bart Thijs and Wolfgang Gl{\"a}nzel},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2007},
  volume={79},
  pages={593-621}
}
At present China is challenging the leading sciento-economic powers and evolving to one of the world’s largest potentials in science and technology. Jointly with other emerging economies, China has already changed the balance of power among the formerly leading nations as measured by scientific production.In the present paper, the evolution of China’s publication activity and citation impact in the social sciences is studied for the period 1997–2006. Besides the comparative analysis of trends… 

Toward internationalization: A bibliometric analysis of the social sciences in Mainland China from 1979 to 2018

The findings show that the number of social science articles published by Chinese authors in international journals has experienced a noticeable increase, and the collaboration networks of researchers from Mainland China have broadened, with the numberof articles with a Chinese first author showing a strong upward trend.

The emergence of China in international academic management research: A nuanced analysis following the new f²-methodology

  • Y. Fassin
  • Business
    Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
  • 2021
In a few decades, China has made a huge rise in science, exemplified with an impressive expansion of academic publications. The management field has traditionally been dominated by the US

Current and future challenges of the Chinese research system

  • H. HortaW. Shen
  • Education
    Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
  • 2019
ABSTRACT This paper assesses the evolution and current situation of the Chinese research system, mainly the academic research system from 1996 to 2017, using trend analysis and the revealed

Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences

The coauthorship patterns of China's HSS significantly evolved from NOC to NAC, BIC and MIC, and China’s major collaborators had not significantly varied over the past decade.

The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences: Developing a Scientific Power Index

The purpose of this study is to evaluate publication output and citation impact in the social sciences in Malaysia, based on Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) data, for the period 1999–2008. In

A comparative study of Ocean Engineering research between China and the world

This study has compared the collaborative relationship of China in detail both from the aspects of countries and institutes and found that China did not performance equally well in terms of citation counts and h-index.

Scientific knowledge production in China: a comparative analysis

The results show that China has reached the same level of scientific publication capacity as Japan and Korea since 2006, and has recently overtaken Japan to become the biggest scientific powerhouse in the Asia Pacific region.

The development of computer science research in the People’s Republic of China 2000–2009: a bibliometric study

It is shown that China dominates the BRIC nations in terms of both publications and citations, but that Indian publications often have a greater individual impact.

Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science

Growth in relations with eastern European nations does not match the growth in the relationship between China and the United States, and both countries can benefit from the relationship, but for the U.S., greater benefit would come from a more targeted strategy.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006

With the fast development of its economy, China plays an increasingly important role in the world. China's performance in science is also impressive. The exponential growth of Chinese scientific

Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system

Based on the Science Citation Index-Expanded web-version, the USA is still by far the strongest nation in terms of scientific performance. Its relative decline in percentage share of publications is

Evaluation of Research Performance and Scientometric Indicators in China

Chinese scientists and decision makers are, like their counterparts elsewhere in the world, highly interested in analysing the quality of their country’s academic and technological achievements.

International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research?

It is shown that international collaboration was not developing similarly in the countries under study, and since 1990 an increasing scientific collaboration with highly developed countries can be observed in all five countries.

Bibliometric indicators and the social sciences

Social science research is published in a wider variety of publication types and addresses more national issues than natural science research. This makes the construction of internationally

Measuring China"s research performance using the Science Citation Index

The main conclusion is that bibliometric analyses based on the ISI databases in principle provide useful and valid indicators of the international position of Chinese research activities, provided that these analyses deal properly with the relatively large number of national Chinese journals covered by the ISI indexes.

‘Triad’ or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world

The authors show, using the mirror of science and technology indicators, that the triad model does no longer hold in the 21st century.

International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985

In the present flash co-authorship data of science journal papers published in the 1981-1985 period are compiled and analysed and a similar investigation is focussed on international collaboration in analytical chemistry.

National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003) An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix

The results confirm that a process of European homogenisation and convergence is taking place, but also show that this process is slow and that member countries have maintained their individual peculiarities and preferences during this evolution.