Is Aristotle's Definition of Change Circular?

@article{Heinaman1994IsAD,
  title={Is Aristotle's Definition of Change Circular?},
  author={Robert Heinaman},
  journal={Apeiron},
  year={1994},
  volume={27},
  pages={25 - 38}
}
La definition aristotelicienne du changement dans « La Physique » III peut etre critiquee pour sa circularite. D'apres l'A., la nouvelle interpretation de la definition avancee par certains philosophes pour sa defense devrait etre rejetee 

ARISTOTLE'S DOUBLE SOLUTION TO ZENO'S 'DICHOTOMY', SIGN OF A RADICAL REVISION?

In the Physics Aristotle offers two solutions to Zeno’s ‘Dichotomy’. Waterlow and Sorabji intend to show that the existence of two solutions indicates Aristotle’s radical revision of the Physics’

The Actuality of the Movable (by the Mover): a Relational Interpretation of Aristotle’s Definition of Motion

Abstract The paper discusses Aristotle’s conception of motion and proposes a new perspective for a reading. Of course, motion can be located between two states of a movable, between potentiality and

Aristotle on Action

When I raise my arm, what makes it the case that my arm's going up is an instance of my raising my arm? In this paper, I discuss Aristotle's answer to this question. His view, I argue, is that my

The Problem of Substantial Generation in Aristotle's Physical Writings

........................................................................................... iv Introduction ...................................................................................... 1

Time: A Measure of Change

A short notice on Robert Heinaman’s account of Aristotle’s definition of kinêsis in Physica III

In Physica III. 1-2 we can find at least two explicit definitions of change (ki/nhsiv): (1) The actuality of what potentially is, qua such (h( tou~ duna/mei o1ntov e0ntele/xeia, h[\| toiou~ton. Phys.