Irrational Option Exclusion

@article{Jeppsson2018IrrationalOE,
  title={Irrational Option Exclusion},
  author={Sofia Jeppsson},
  journal={Ethical Theory and Moral Practice},
  year={2018},
  volume={21},
  pages={537-551}
}
  • Sofia Jeppsson
  • Published 1 June 2018
  • Economics
  • Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
In this paper, I describe a hitherto overlooked kind of practical irrationality, which I call irrational option exclusion. An agent who suffers from this problem does not merely fail to act on her best judgement – she fails to realize that the superior action is even an option for her. I furthermore argue that this kind of irrationality is serious enough to undermine moral responsibility. I show that an agent suffering from this problem has compromised reasons-responsiveness, does not really… Expand
1 Citations
Retributivism, Justification and Credence: The Epistemic Argument Revisited
Harming other people is prima facie wrong. Unless we can be very certain that doing so is justified under the circumstances, we ought not to do it. In this paper, I argue that we ought to dismantleExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Control, responsibility, and moral assessment
Recently, a number of philosophers have begun to question the commonly held view that choice or voluntary control is a precondition of moral responsibility. According to these philosophers, whatExpand
Responsibility, Tracing, and Consequences
Some accounts of moral responsibility hold that an agent's responsibility is completely determined by some aspect of the agent's mental life at the time of action. For example, some hold that anExpand
Reasons, Determinism and the Ability to Do otherwise
It has been argued that in a deterministic universe, no one has any reason to do anything. Since we ought to do what we have most reason to do, no one ought to do anything either. Firstly, it isExpand
Reasons and Impossibility
Many philosophers claim that it cannot be the case that a person ought to perform an action if this person cannot perform this action. However, most of these philosophers do not give arguments forExpand
The Good and the Right
T. M. Scanlon has revived a venerable tradition according to which something's being good consists in its being such that there is a reason to respond positively towards it. He has presented novelExpand
Traction without Tracing: A (Partial) Solution for Control-Based Accounts of Moral Responsibility
Control-based accounts of moral responsibility face a familiar problem. There are some actions which look like obvious cases of responsibility but which appear equally obviously to lack the requisiteExpand
Freedom within Reason
Philosophers typically see the issue of free will and determinism in terms of a debate between two standard positions. Incompatibilism holds that freedom and responsibility require causal andExpand
Précis of Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility
The idea of moral responsibility is central to a wide range of our moral, social, and legal practices, and it underpins our basic notion of culpability. Yet the idea of moral responsibility isExpand
Obedience to Authority
Between August 1961 and May 1962, Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram (1963, 1965, 1974) conducted a series of investigations on the psychology of obedience. Under the guise of a learning experiment,Expand
Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Twin Earth
A popular form of virtue epistemology—defended by such figures as Ernest Sosa, Linda Zagzebski and John Greco—holds that knowledge can be exclusively understood in virtue-theoretic terms. InExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...