• Corpus ID: 244908541

Invitation in Crowdsourcing Contests

@article{Shi2021InvitationIC,
  title={Invitation in Crowdsourcing Contests},
  author={Qi Shi and Dong Hao},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2021},
  volume={abs/2112.02884}
}
In a crowdsourcing contest, a requester holding a task posts it to a crowd. People in the crowd then compete with each other to win the rewards. Although in real life, a crowd is usually networked and people influence each other via social ties, existing crowdsourcing contest theories do not aim to answer how interpersonal relationships influence peoples’ incentives and behaviors, and thereby affect the crowdsourcing performance. In this work, we novelly take peoples’ social ties as a key… 

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES
BciNet: A Biased Contest-Based Crowdsourcing Incentive Mechanism Through Exploiting Social Networks
TLDR
Simulation results based on the real dataset show that BciNet can greatly improve the amount of participants’ effort levels, and actually be robust against the sybil attack.
Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions
TLDR
A model in which users select among, and subsequently compete in, a collection of contests offering various rewards is presented and it is found that rewards yield logarithmically diminishing returns with respect to participation levels.
Optimal Design of Crowdsourcing Contests
TLDR
This paper represents the first general analysis of the economics of crowdsourcing contests, provides a simple rule of thumb for determining the optimal prize structure for practitioners who are considering designing such contests, and also discusses the welfare implications of organizing production or R&D as a Web-based contest of this kind.
Incentive Mechanism Design for Heterogeneous Crowdsourcing Using All-Pay Contests
TLDR
This study designs an incentive mechanism for heterogeneous crowdsourcing scenarios using an asymmetric all-pay contest (or auction) model, and discovers a counter-intuitive property, called strategy autonomy (SA), which means that heterogeneous workers behave independently of one another as if they were in a homogeneous setting.
Optimal Crowdsourcing Contests
TLDR
A theory is given that the optimal crowdsourcing contest is a virtual valuation optimizer (the virtual valuation function depends on the distribution of contestant skills and the number of contestants), and a comparison with more conventional means of procurement shows that crowdsourcing contests are 2-approximations to conventional methods for a large family of "regular" distributions.
Effective Prize Structure for Simple Crowdsourcing Contests with Participation Costs
TLDR
It is shown that there is a class of settings where the use of the multi-prize crowdsourcing contest model enables achieving the performance of the fully cooperative model, and that for settings of this class the optimal prize allocation can be extracted through a set of linear equations.
Quality Expectation-Variance Tradeoffs in Crowdsourcing Contests
TLDR
This work examines designs for crowdsourcing contests, where participants compete for rewards given to superior solutions of a task, and shows an expectation-variance tradeoff of the principal's utility in such contests through a Pareto efficient frontier.
Efficient crowdsourcing contests
TLDR
This work addresses efficient execution of procurement from a social planner's perspective, taking account of and optimally balancing the value to the principal with the costs to producers (modeled as effort expenditure) while, crucially, contending with self-interest on the part of all players.
Implementing optimal outcomes in social computing: a game-theoretic approach
TLDR
It is shown that optimal outcomes can never be implemented by contests if the system can rank the qualities of contributions perfectly, but if there is noise in the contributions' rankings, then the mechanism designer can again induce agents to follow strategies that maximize his utility.
Tractable (Simple) Contests
TLDR
This paper examines a variation of the classic contest that alleviates this problem by having contestants make the decisions sequentially rather than in parallel, and finds that the modified mechanism offers great benefit for the principal, both in terms of an increased over-participation in the contest and increased average profit.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...