Inverting Animus: Masterpiece Cakeshop and the New Minorities

@article{Murray2019InvertingAM,
  title={Inverting Animus: Masterpiece Cakeshop and the New Minorities},
  author={Melissa E. Murray},
  journal={The Supreme Court Review},
  year={2019},
  volume={2018},
  pages={257 - 297}
}
Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Human Rights Commission has been discussed in fairly specific terms—the collision of liberty and equality; or, more particularly, religious freedom versus antidiscrimination norms. This frame is certainly accurate, though hardly exhaustive. There are a number of lenses through which we might understand this case. And, indeed, different lenses may cast the Court’s decision in entirely new lights, bringing the decision into conversations that may, at first blush… 
1 Citations

Religious Exemptions Increase Discrimination Towards Same-Sex Couples: Evidence from Masterpiece Cakeshop

In 2018, the Supreme Court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission in favor of a baker who refused service to a same-sex couple due to his religious beliefs. This article

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES

The Unrelenting Libertarian Challenge to Public Accommodations Law

There seems to be a broad consensus that Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits race discrimination in “place[s] of public accommodation,” was a remarkable success. But the

Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles Over Brown

When Brown v. Board of EducationI prohibited racial segregation in public education, it inaugurated a great debate about equal citizenship and federalism that spanned the second half of the twentieth

The New Lochner

Commercial interests are increasingly laying claim, often successfully, to First Amendment protections. Once the mainstay of political liberty, the First Amendment has emerged as a powerful

Of Burdens and Baselines: Hobby Lobby's Puzzling Footnote 37

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014) was a remarkably controversial decision even for perpetually controversial church/state doctrine. The controversy has obscured an important principle that

One Hundred Years Of Equality: Saving California's Statutory Ban On Arbitrary Discrimination By Businesses

Most U.S. laws prohibiting discrimination by businesses focus on specific types of discrimination - race, religion, gender, age, or disability, for example. For over 100 years, California has taken a

Protecting Privacy to Prevent Discrimination

A person cannot consider information that she does not have. Unlawful discrimination, therefore, frequently requires discriminators to have knowledge about protected status. This Article exploits

How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment

  • NY Times

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 USC § 1681 et seq

    Federal Office of Civil Rights Investigates Yale

      Free Exercise Lochnerism, 115 Colum L Rev

      • 2015