Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics.

@article{Brandt2012InventingCO,
  title={Inventing conflicts of interest: a history of tobacco industry tactics.},
  author={Allan M. Brandt},
  journal={American journal of public health},
  year={2012},
  volume={102 1},
  pages={
          63-71
        }
}
  • A. Brandt
  • Published 2012
  • Political Science
  • American journal of public health
Confronted by compelling peer-reviewed scientific evidence of the harms of smoking, the tobacco industry, beginning in the 1950s, used sophisticated public relations approaches to undermine and distort the emerging science. The industry campaign worked to create a scientific controversy through a program that depended on the creation of industry-academic conflicts of interest. This strategy of producing scientific uncertainty undercut public health efforts and regulatory interventions designed… 

Transparency and Conflicts in Science: History of Influence, Scandal, and Denial

Corporate finances influence many areas of science, originating with tobacco companies which hired public relations firms to protect their profits from research on the harms of smoking. Despite a

Reassessing policy paradigms: A comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries

The extensive similarities which exist between the tobacco and alcohol industries in terms of market structure and strategy, and political strategy, call into question the rationale for both the relatively weak regulatory approach taken towards alcohol, and the continued participation of alcohol corporations in policy-making processes.

Making knowledge legitimate: transnational advocacy networks' campaigns against tobacco, infant formula and pharmaceuticals

In this article, we examine three different cases in which health activists lobbied the World Health Organization and its member states to regulate the marketing practices of multinational companies.

Paying lip service to publication ethics: scientific publishing practices and the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World

Whether scientific publishing needs to be better protected from the tobacco industry in light of this, and if so, how, is explored and how conflicts of interest are governed in the journals FSFW targets.

The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19

  • F. Deruelle
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Surgical neurology international
  • 2022
By supporting and selecting only the one side of science information while suppressing alternative viewpoints, and with obvious conflicts of interest revealed by this study, governments and the media constantly disinform the public.

The debate on regulating menthol cigarettes: closing a dangerous loophole vs freedom of choice.

The public debate from 2008 to 2011 over the exemption for menthol was examined, finding that public health must prioritize and invest in the leadership of communities most affected by health harms to ensure a strong, unrelenting voice in support of health equity.

Abusing science

Three topics rooted in biology and biomedicine are examined—creationism, harms from tobacco, and opioid addiction—to show that those purveying misinformation employ a consistent pattern of intellectual dishonesty to delegitimize science that challenges their ideological positions.

Politics, profit, and psychiatric diagnosis: a case study of tobacco use disorder.

  • L. Hirshbein
  • Psychology, Medicine
    American journal of public health
  • 2014
The conflicting commercial, professional, and political aims that helped to construct psychiatric diagnoses relating to smoking are reviewed, suggesting that a diagnosis regarding tobacco has as much to do with social and cultural circumstances as it does with science.

Addiction journals and the management of conflicts of interest

Stenius, K. (2016). Addiction journals and the management of conflicts of interest.  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (1), 9-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i1.233
...

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES

The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?

Analysis of empirical and historical evidence pertaining to tobacco and food industry practices, messages, and strategies to influence public opinion, legislation and regulation, litigation, and the conduct of science highlights important lessons that can be learned from the tobacco experience and recommends actions for the food industry.

Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking

Analysis of public statements issued by the tobacco industry sources over the past five decades shows that the companies maintained the stance that smoking had not been proven to be injurious to health through 1999.

The Cigarette Controversy

This study examines the history of the cigarette controversy using the tobacco documents as a roadmap to explore the following four questions: (a) What did tobacco companies know about the health

Blaming tobacco's victims

Public discussion of the British American Tobacco case in Australia provides sobering reminders of the power of victim blaming to undermine what otherwise would be unequivocally good news.

Understanding financial conflicts of interest.

  • D. Thompson
  • Medicine, Political Science
    The New England journal of medicine
  • 1993
The problem of conflicts of interest began to receive serious attention in the medical literature in the 1980s1,2. Studies have described a wide range of conflicts involving physicians, medical

Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers.

More stringent regulation is necessary, including the elimination or modification of common practices related to small gifts, pharmaceutical samples, continuing medical education, funds for physician travel, speakers bureaus, ghostwriting, and consulting and research contracts.