Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids.

@article{Mylanus1998IntraindividualCO,
  title={Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids.},
  author={Emmanuel A M Mylanus and Kitty T.M. van der Pouw and Ad. F. M. Snik and Cor W.R.J. Cremers},
  journal={Archives of otolaryngology--head \& neck surgery},
  year={1998},
  volume={124 3},
  pages={
          271-6
        }
}
BACKGROUND Some patients have to stop using their air-conduction hearing aid(s) because it causes or exacerbates chronic otitis. [] Key MethodDESIGN Prospective clinical evaluation in a single subject design. PATIENTS The results of 34 consecutive patients from the Nijmegen, the Netherlands, BAHA series were included. The patients had bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss and chronic ear problems. Before the BAHA was fitted, the patients used air-conduction hearing aids.

Figures and Tables from this paper

[Comparison of audiological performance bewteen bone-anchored and conventional hearing aids].
TLDR
Compared the function of BAHA to conventional bone and air-conduction hearing aids based on functional gain and speech discrimination tests in quiet and noisy environments in 2 patients with chronic ear problems, audiological performance with the BAHA showed an evident preference, indicating that the width of the air-bone gap is of some help in BAHA preference compared to air- conditional hearing aids.
[Audiological effect of bone-anchored hearing aid].
TLDR
The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) has proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional air and bone conduction hearing aids for patients suffering from chronic otitis media or bilateral aural atresia and offers a number of important advantages, including greater cosmetic acceptability, improved speech intelligibility, and better sound quality.
A Comparison of the Audiometric Performance of Bone Anchored Hearing Aids and Air Conduction Hearing Aids
  • M. Bance, S. Abel, B. Papsin, P. Wade, J. Vendramini
  • Medicine
    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
  • 2002
TLDR
The BAHA, although using a nonphysiologic sound conduction route, did not sacrifice temporal processing ability or speech perception in noise, and should be considered for patients with profuse ear drainage.
Hearing Rehabilitation through Bone-Conducted Sound Stimulation: Preliminary Results
TLDR
It was found that the participants benefited from the use of BAHA, and improved both the auditory perception and the tinnitus handicap.
Candidacy for the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid
TLDR
Preliminary results on the application of the BAHA in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss suggest that stereophonic hearing can be re-established and the most powerful BAHA can be applied to patients with a sensorineural hearing loss component of up to 60 dB HL.
Does the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Have a Complementary Effect on Audiological and Subjective Outcomes in Patients with Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss?
TLDR
The BAHA proved to be a beneficial means to optimize binaural hearing in patients with severe (40–60 dB) unilateral conductive hearing loss according to audiometric data and patient outcome measures.
The Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for children: Recent developments
TLDR
The BAHA system can be considered a new, indispensable tool for children with bilateral conductive hearing loss and in children under the age of three to four years, a conventional solution must be applied, because they are too young to undergo BAHA implant surgery.
Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids in Unilateral Inner Ear Deafness: An Evaluation of Audiometric and Patient Outcome Measurements
  • M. Hol, A. Bosman, A. Snik, E. Mylanus, C. Cremers
  • Medicine
    Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
  • 2005
TLDR
The poor sound-localization results in an audiologic test setting illustrated the inability of patients with unilateral inner ear deafness to localize sounds.
An overview of different systems: the bone-anchored hearing aid.
TLDR
The surgical techniques used to implant the titanium fixture for Baha application have been modified and further developed to reach two main goals: optimal osseointegration and preparation of the implant site to minimize the occurrence of soft tissue reactions.
Results and complications of the Baha system (bone-anchored hearing aid)
TLDR
The data from this study show that the Baha system offers a high percentage of success, which can significantly improve the patient’s quality of life, and a low rate of complications.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Audiological Results of the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid HC200: Multicenter Results
TLDR
It is concluded that the BAHA is superior to the CBHA and none of the patients in the ACHA group achieved a better speech recognition in quiet score using theBAHA.
A Speech-to-Noise Ratio Test with the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: A Comparative Study
TLDR
With new speech material consisting of sentences in noise, the speech-to-noise ratio (SN) has been determined for 24 patients and patients who previously used a conventional bone conduction hearing aid improved their SN on the average by 3.3 dB.
Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with sensorineural hearing loss and persistent otitis externa.
TLDR
Although it did not produce optimal results, the bone-anchored hearing aid or BAHA seems to be the best solution for patients with a predominant sensorineural hearing loss, patients who suffer from an almost instantaneous skin reaction to any kind of earmould.
Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids.
TLDR
The results with the BAHA compared with the air-conduction hearing aid were ambiguous for speech recognition, but all the patients reported a decrease in ear infections.
Audiologic Results for the Bone‐Anchored Hearing Aid HC220
TLDR
Overall, speech recognition with the HC220 was comparable with or better than a conventional bone conduction hearing aid; however, compared with an air conduction Hearing aid the results were ambiguous.
Estimation of the Benefit of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids
TLDR
In conclusion, in all series to date, previous users of a conventional bone conduction aid have been delighted users ofA bone-anchored hearing aid and have gained superior audiometric benefit, whereas the nonusers did not.
[Air conduction or bone conduction hearing aids? Comments on hearing aids for sound conduction deafness (author's transl)].
TLDR
It can be shown that basically there is no objection against the use of a bone-conduction hearing aid (ear-level aid) for patients suffering only from sound- Conduction hearing defects.
Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system.
TLDR
The present paper summarizes the results in 147 patients over 10 years, including a total of 6,334 follow-up months, and suggests that the improved quality of life reported by the patients is a combination of improvedquality of sound, improved comfort, and relief from middle ear and ear canal disease occasioned by conventional hearing aids.
Clinical experience with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
TLDR
A new technique where a hearing aid for bone-conducted sound is mounted on an osseointegrated titanium screw located in the mastoid area is available, and patients operated on for chronic otitis media are very satisfied with the hearing results and the hearing aid.
...
...