Intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cell by G-CSF is better than mobilization alone by G-CSF for improvement of cardiac function and remodeling: 2-year follow-up results of the Myocardial Regeneration and Angiogenesis in Myocardial Infarction with G-CSF and Intra-Coronary S

@article{Kang2007IntracoronaryIO,
  title={Intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cell by G-CSF is better than mobilization alone by G-CSF for improvement of cardiac function and remodeling: 2-year follow-up results of the Myocardial Regeneration and Angiogenesis in Myocardial Infarction with G-CSF and Intra-Coronary S},
  author={Hyun-Jae Kang and Hyo Soo Kim and B A Koo and Yong-Jin Kim and Dong-Soo Lee and D G Sohn and Byung Hee Oh and Young-Bae Park},
  journal={American heart journal},
  year={2007},
  volume={153 2},
  pages={237.e1-8}
}
BACKGROUND The results of stem cell therapy trials in myocardial infarction using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are inconsistent among trials, and the long-term outcome of G-CSF-based stem cell therapy remains unknown. We reported 2 years of follow-up results of 2 different strategies of G-CSF-based stem cell therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS We compared outcomes of intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) with G-CSF, mobilization alone with G-CSF… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 38 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…