Corpus ID: 220402417

Interpreting Arguments

@inproceedings{Lumer2010InterpretingA,
  title={Interpreting Arguments},
  author={C. Lumer and F. H. Eemeren and J. A. Blair and C. Willard and A. Snoeck},
  year={2010}
}
The aim of this paper is to develop and justify a specific methodology of interpreting arguments for judging their argumentative validity and adequacy, i.e. the aim is to provide a useful tool which may be used for a specific purpose. This does not exclude that there are or may be other useful methodologies for interpreting arguments which could serve for different purposes. The methodology exposed in the paper will not only be theoretically justified but also specified up to detailed rules… Expand
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons
A Theory of Philosophical Arguments
Testing for Structure Recognition
The Paradox of Charity
What is Wrong with Deductivism?

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse
Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses
Belief and the basis of meaning
Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning
Utterer's meaning and intentions
Toward a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action
Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses. Argumentation
  • 1997
Individual decision making
Grundbegriffe der Kommunikation
...
1
2
...