• DOI:10.1179/000269805X77781
• Corpus ID: 170087190

Interpretation and the Hieroglyphic Monad: John Dee's Reading of Pantheus's Voarchadumia

@article{Norrgrn2005InterpretationAT,
  title={Interpretation and the Hieroglyphic Monad: John Dee's Reading of Pantheus's Voarchadumia},
  author={Hilde Norrgr{\'e}n},
  journal={Ambix},
  year={2005},
  volume={52},
  pages={217 - 245}
}

• Hilde Norrgrén
• Published 1 November 2005
• Art
• Ambix

Abstract John Dee's marginalia in his copy of Johannes Pantheus's Voarchadumia (now in the British Library) are an interesting source of information about the development of Dee's scientific ideas in the period between the Propaedeumata Aphoristica (1558) and the Monas Hieroglyphica (1564). In reading the book, Dee has systematically compared the text with Pantheus's earlier work, the Ars Metallicae, and noted any differences between the two largely identical works. Therefore, most of Dee's comments are not indications of his own interests, as has previously been assumed. Only the marginalia that are not concerned with comparing the two texts can be taken to express Dee's own views. These marginalia, probably written in 1559, provide evidence that Dee had already at this time a strong interest in cabbalistic methods as a means of gaining knowledge about natural substances. Cabbalistic speculation was to be central to Dee's thought in the Monas Hieroglyphica, and has previously been taken to indicate a dramatic change in Dee's scientific outlook, towards a spiritual quest. In his marginalia in the Voarchadumia, however, Dee appears to be using cabbalistic methods to gain information on wholly material, non-spiritual matters. The abundant use of the symbol of the hieroglyphic monad in the marginalia provides a further source of insight into the alchemical import of the symbol, five years before the publication of the Monas Hieroglyphica.