• Corpus ID: 231296284

International criminal courts and the introduction of the Daubert standard as a mode of assessing the psychological impact of warfare on civilians : a comparative perspective

@inproceedings{Solomon2019InternationalCC,
  title={International criminal courts and the introduction of the Daubert standard as a mode of assessing the psychological impact of warfare on civilians : a comparative perspective},
  author={Solon Solomon},
  year={2019}
}
Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions:  Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).  Non Commercial… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 164 REFERENCES
The Judicial Review Powers of the Presidency of the International Criminal Court: Safeguards for the Protection of Human Rights
AbstractIn view of the ten-year anniversary of the entry into force of the Rome Statute, this article examines the functions of a lesser-known organ of the Court – the Presidency. Focusing
Judicial Lawmaking at the ad hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and "Adventurous Interpretation"
The UN Security Council’s instruction that the ICTY should apply its Statute without legislating new international law was not realistic because it failed to take into account the underdeveloped
Regulating Resort to Force: Form and Substance of the UN Charter Regime
Much of the international legal debate about regulating force and self-defence takes place on a substantive axis, focusing on the scope of force prohibitions and exceptions. This article instead
Report – Recent Case Law of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) in Strafsachen (Criminal Law)
Reporting on one year of the Bundesgerichtshof's (BGH – Federal Court of Justice) jurisprudence in criminal affairs is always a delicate matter. We have decided to limit ourselves to report on a
Utility of Daubert guidelines in India
This paper deliberates on the legal admissibility criteria and competence of scientific evidence and expert opinion in the courts of America and its use in Indian law. A review of important events in
Balancing Legal Process with Scientific Expertise: Expert Witness Methodology in Five Nations and Suggestions for Reform of Post-Daubert U.S. Reliability Determinations
In a recent article on science and the law, Susan Haack suggested that “we could learn something from the experiences of other nations that are equally technologically advanced, but have
Judicial Lawmaking and General Principles of Law in International Criminal Law
General principles of law are a primary mechanism for “gap-filling” in international criminal law. However, their interpretation by tribunals has been fitful, contradictory, and misguided. Given
Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?
The recent history of criminal justice contains an apparent anomaly: the simultaneous renaissance of retributive and reparative models of justice. This article will explore the genesis and competing
Daubert and Junk Science: Have Admissibility Standards Changed?
ALTHOUGH courts and commentators alike have confused the roles of Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 703 and have applied various tests to "scientific" evidence inconsistently, the decisions may not
“Regulatory Daubert”: A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency Science by Incorporating Daubert Principles into Administrative Law
I INTRODUCTION In the landmark decision of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1) the United States Supreme Court empowered federal judges to reject irrelevant or unreliable scientific
...
...