Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals

  title={Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals},
  author={Alberto Baccini and Lucio Barabesi},
The exploratory analysis developed in this paper relies on the hypothesis that each editor possesses some power in the definition of the editorial policy of her journal. Consequently if the same scholar sits on the board of editors of two journals, those journals could have some common elements in their editorial policies. The proximity of the editorial policies of two scientific journals can be assessed by the number of common editors sitting on their boards. A database of all editors of… 
Seats at the table: the network of the editorial boards in information and library science
Social Network Analysis and Academic Performance of the Editorial Board Members for Journals of Library and Information Science
A social network matrix of the editorial board members about CSSCI journals of Library and Information Science is built and some problems which exist in the current regime are discussed.
In the hands of outstandIng scIentIsts ? a study on the determInants of edItorIal boards membershIP In economIcs Documents de travail GREDEG GREDEG Working Papers Series
This paper aims at casting light on editorial boards of leading journals in economics. This topic has been largely neglected by economists and sociologists of science, although the crucial role
Interlocking Editorships in Scientific Journals
The composition of EBMs of 518 journals in the humanities and social sciences accredited by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran was investigated and revealed that 2573 unique individuals holding the 5188 editorial board positions (an average of 10 members per journal) are revealed.
Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field
It is found that the diversity of editorial board members in terms of institution is negatively related to ABS ranking, but unrelated to the five-year impact factor and the eigenfactors, suggesting that more effort is needed to increase the diversity in the composition of editorial teams in order to ensure transparency and promote equity.
Similarity network fusion for scholarly journals
Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations
Results indicate that intellectual proximity is also proximity among authors and among editors of the journals, and the three maps of editorial power, intellectual proximity, and authors communities tell similar stories.
Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field
This paper investigates how KM–IC journals are connected through EBI, which journals are the most influential within KM-IC field and identify if KM– IC scholarly journal network breaks into subgroups.
Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals
This study extends the scarce knowledge on editorial teams and their relevance to journal impact by integrating different strands of literature and studying several demographic factors simultaneously, and finds that diversity of editorial teams in terms of gender and nationality is largely unrelated toJournal impact.


How are Statistical Journals Linked: A Network Analysis
The exploratory analysis developed in this paper relies on the hypothesis that each editor possesses some power in the definition of the editorial policy of her journal. Consequently if the same
The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly?
This paper examines data on the institutional backgrounds of editors and authors of the top thirty economics journals, identified by their 1995 citation impact. It is revealed, for example, that 70.8
The Journals of Economics
We examine the principal journals of economics, with particular attention to the communication between journals, as reflected by the network of interjournal citations during 1987-90, and the changes
Towards a European economics of economics: Monitoring a decade of top research and providing some explanation
Strong evidence for the 'institutional oligopoly' of editors and authors hypothesis is found but in a dynamic context this departmental concentration of authorship and editorial board membership does not represent a 'closed shop'.
Editorial Favoritism in Economics
Are articles by authors with institutional connections or personal ties to the publishing journal's editor(s)/coeditors of lower quality than those authored without such connections? Examination of
Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences
The growth of SNA is documented and a co-author network of S NA is drawn, and centrality measures of the SNA network are calculated.
Gaining scientific recognition by position: Does editorship increase citation rates?
Findings indicate that, for American journals, assuming editorship responsibilities for a major psychology journal increases one's scientific impact, at least as reflected by a measure of citation rate, which contradict the convention of using citation rates as pure performance measures.
Introduction to Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks
Networks pervade social and economic life, and they play a prominent role in explaining a huge variety of social and economic phenomena. Standard economic theory did not give much credit to the role
Scientific Networks and Co-authorship
Using a database of all published articles in economic journals over the last 30 years, we investigate the determinants of scientific co-authorship. We find that, controlling for pair-wise fixed
The Game Academics Play: Editors Versus Authors
This article studies a game between authors and editors. Editors play as leaders while authors are the followers. Authors maximize the number of publications seeking to increase the impact of their