Intergroup Aggression in Chimpanzees and War in Nomadic Hunter-Gatherers

@article{Wrangham2012IntergroupAI,
  title={Intergroup Aggression in Chimpanzees and War in Nomadic Hunter-Gatherers},
  author={Richard W. Wrangham and Luke Glowacki},
  journal={Human Nature},
  year={2012},
  volume={23},
  pages={5-29}
}
Chimpanzee and hunter-gatherer intergroup aggression differ in important ways, including humans having the ability to form peaceful relationships and alliances among groups. This paper nevertheless evaluates the hypothesis that intergroup aggression evolved according to the same functional principles in the two species—selection favoring a tendency to kill members of neighboring groups when killing could be carried out safely. According to this idea chimpanzees and humans are equally risk… 

The evolution of intergroup tolerance in nonhuman primates and humans

TLDR
It is explored how the human foraging ecology, especially large spatial and temporal fluctuations in resource availability, may have selected for a greater reliance on tolerant between‐community relationships—relationships reinforced by status acquisition and cultural institutions.

Asymmetries in altruistic behavior during violent intergroup conflict.

  • Hannes Rusch
  • Psychology
    Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
  • 2013
TLDR
This study finds that altruistic behavior towards members of the in-group indeed seems to occur more frequently when soldiers are defending themselves and their comrades against enemy attacks, and proposes that this asymmetry reflects adaptive behavioral responses to the materially different strategic character of attacks and defenses under ancestral conditions.

Lethal Aggression in Mobile Forager Bands and Implications for the Origins of War

TLDR
Investigating lethal aggression in a sample of 21 mobile forager band societies derived systematically from the standard cross-cultural sample suggests that most incidents of lethal aggression among MFBS may be classified as homicides, a few others as feuds, and a minority as war.

Myths about hunter-gatherers redux: nomadic forager war and peace

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critique several studies that claim to show that nomadic foragers engage in high levels of inter-group aggression. This is done through exploring four myths:

Ancestral Hierarchy and Conflict

  • C. Boehm
  • Political Science, Biology
    Science
  • 2012
TLDR
An evolutionary trajectory is traced from this ancestor to extant hunter-gatherers, whose coalitional behavior results in suppressed dominance and competition, except in mate competition.

Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men

TLDR
The composition of lethal coalitions from the Yanomamö, a tribal society in Amazonia, is examined to support the strategic alliance model of coalitionary aggression, demonstrate the complexities of human alliance formation, and illuminate key differences in social structure distinguishing humans from other primates.

Resource scarcity drives lethal aggression among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California

TLDR
Results show that individuals are prone to violence in times and places of resource scarcity, providing a clear rationale to understand why violence may be greater in specific times or places through human history, which can help predict where and when it may arise in the future.

The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers

TLDR
This study confirms the functional similarities between the raiding of chimpanzees and human foragers, and it supports the “imbalance of power” hypothesis for raiding, but also proposes two amendments to this model.

Intergroup Competition Enhances Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) In-group Cohesion

TLDR
Investigation of the immediate and long-term effects of intergroup competition on measures of in-group cohesion, namely modularity, party size, and intergroup aggression found that groups’ association patterns were less modular (more cohesive) in months in which they engaged in more border patrols and inter group encounters.

Parochial cooperation in wild chimpanzees: a model to explain the evolution of parochial altruism

TLDR
Evidence that the oxytocinergic system and in-group cooperation and cohesion during out-group threat are integral parts of chimpanzee collective action during intergroup competition is reviewed.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 193 REFERENCES

Intergroup Aggression in Primates and Humans: The Case for a Unified Theory

TLDR
It is proposed that the essential functional reasons for intergroup competition are consistent across group-living primates and humans: strength in numbers predicts long-term access to resources.

INTERGROUP RELATIONS IN CHIMPANZEES

TLDR
Data from the five long-term sites with neighboring groups show that intergroup aggression is a pervasive feature of chimpanzee societies, including sites where artificial feeding never took place.

Intergroup conflicts among chimpanzees in Taï National Park: lethal violence and the female perspective

TLDR
A reconsideration of the difference in intergroup interactions between eastern and western chimpanzees is proposed including a more important consideration of the female's perspective and new parallels to be drawn with the evolution of primitive warfare in humans.

Intergroup Aggression in Chimpanzees and Humans [and Comments and Replies]

TLDR
Examination of comparative data on nonhuman primates and crosscultural study of foraging societies suggests that attacks are lethal because where there is sufficient imbalance of power their cost is trivial, and that it is resources of reproductive interest to males that determine the causes of intergroup aggression.

Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans

TLDR
Preliminary data support Boehm’s hypothesis that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans have similar rates of death from intraspecific aggression, whereas chimpanzees have higher rates of non-lethal physical attack.

Lethal intergroup aggression by chimpanzees in Kibale National Park, Uganda

TLDR
Data is added to the database on intergroup coalitionary aggression in chimpanzees by describing three fatal attacks on adult males, plus a fourth attack on an adult male and an attack on a juvenile that were almost certainly fatal.

Fatal Chimpanzee Attack in Loango National Park, Gabon

TLDR
The combined observational and genetic evidence suggest an intercommunity attack on an adult male chimpanzee at a new research site in Loango National Park, Gabon, adding to the growing evidence that intercommunity killings are a rare but widespread phenomenon among chimpanzees and not an artifact of human provisioning or habituation.

Genetic differentiation and the evolution of cooperation in chimpanzees and humans

TLDR
Levels of between-group genetic differentiation in contemporary humans are lower than those used in previous tests, and not higher than those of chimpanzees, which suggests that the identification of other factors that differ between chimpanzees and humans may be needed to provide a compelling explanation of why humans, but not chimpanzees, display the unique features of human cooperation.

Conflict: Why apes and humans kill

Most animals rarely kill their own. Among non-human primates, for example, many species live in social groups and fight with their neighbours. Battles involve loud calls, displays, chases and
...