• DOI:10.1029/JD095ID10P16601
Corpus ID: 16833187

Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models

@article{Cess1990IntercomparisonAI,
  title={Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models},
  author={R. Cess and G. Potter and J. Blanchet and G. Boer and A. Genio and M. D{\'e}qu{\'e} and V. Dymnikov and V. Galin and W. Gates and S. Ghan and J. Kiehl and A. Lacis and H. Treut and Z. Li and X. Liang and B. Mcavaney and V. P. Meleshko and J. Mitchell and J. Morcrette and D. Randall and L. Rikus and E. Roeckner and J. Royer and U. Schlese and D. Sheinin and A. Slingo and A. Sokolov and K. Taylor and W. Washington and R. Wetherald and I. Yagai and M. Zhang},
  journal={Journal of Geophysical Research},
  year={1990},
  volume={95},
  pages={16601-16615}
}

• R. Cess, G. Potter, +29 authors M. Zhang
• Published 1990
• Geology
• Journal of Geophysical Research

The need to understand differences among general circulation model projections of CO2-induced climatic change has motivated the present study, which provides an intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. This intercomparison uses sea surface temperature change as a surrogate for climate change. The interpretation of cloud-climate interactions is given special attention. A roughly threefold variation in one measure of global… Expand

View via Publisher

kiwi.atmos.colostate.edu

Save to Library

Create Alert

Cite

Launch Research Feed