Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations

@article{Leydesdorff2013InteractiveOO,
  title={Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal-journal citations},
  author={Loet Leydesdorff and I. Rafols and C. Chen},
  journal={J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.},
  year={2013},
  volume={64},
  pages={2573-2586}
}
  • Loet Leydesdorff, I. Rafols, C. Chen
  • Published 2013
  • Computer Science
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • This is the accepted version of the following article: Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I. and Chen, C. (2013), Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 64: 2573–2586. doi: 10.1002/asi.22946 
    88 Citations

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996–2012)
    • 35
    • PDF
    A review of theory and practice in scientometrics
    • 252
    • PDF
    Aggregated journal–journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays
    • 22
    • PDF
    A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty
    • 5
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 85 REFERENCES
    Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects
    • 76
    • PDF
    The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI
    • 105
    Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data
    • 86
    • PDF
    A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories
    • 326
    • PDF
    Theories of citation?
    • 103
    Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations
    • 174
    • PDF