Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education.

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare computer-assisted instruction (CAI) with lecture format using recent hardware and software advances. A pre- and post-test was used to determine student performance and instructional preference. In addition, a post-instruction survey was used to determine student learning preferences. METHODS Seventy-five first-year University of North Carolina (UNC) dental students who were registered for the introductory radiology course were asked to participate. All agreed and were randomly placed in one of three groups: interactive CD only, interactive CD and lecture, and lecture only. The content of the multimedia instruction focused on intraoral radiography. A pre- and post-test was administered to determine if there was a significant difference between interactive CD and lecture formats, and an evaluation instrument was used to determine if there was a student learning preference between CAI and lecture format. Analysis of covariance and the sign test were used to determine significance (p<.05). RESULTS There was no significant difference between pre- and post-test outcomes, indicating that similar learning took place using the interactive CD and/or lecture format. However, students preferred CAI to lecture format.

Cite this paper

@article{Howerton2004InteractiveCI, title={Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education.}, author={W Bruce Howerton and Platin R T Enrique and John B. Ludlow and Donald Tyndall}, journal={Journal of dental hygiene : JDH}, year={2004}, volume={78 4}, pages={10} }