Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge

  title={Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge},
  author={H. Collins},
  journal={Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences},
  • H. Collins
  • Published 2004
  • Psychology
  • Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
AbstractBetween formal propositional knowledge and embodied skill lies ‘interactional expertise’—the ability to converse expertly about a practical skill or expertise, but without being able to practice it, learned through linguistic socialisation among the practitioners. Interactional expertise is exhibited by sociologists of scientific knowledge, by scientists themselves and by a large range of other actors. Attention is drawn to the distinction between the social and the individual… Expand
Experiments with interactional expertise
‘Interactional expertise’ is developed through linguistic interaction without full scale practical immersion in a culture. Interactional expertise is the medium of communication in peer review inExpand
Derived embodiment and imaginative capacities in interactional expertise
Interactional expertise is said to be a form of knowledge achieved in a linguistic community and, therefore, obtained entirely outside practice. Supposedly, it is not or only minimally sustained byExpand
Words as cultivators of others minds
It is suggested that, in conversation, interlocutors use Words as Cultivators (WAC) of other minds as a direct result of their embodied–grounded origin, rendering WAC a radical interpretation of the Words as social Tools (WAT) proposal. Expand
Interactional expertise through the looking glass: a peek at mirror neurons
Abstract Interactional expertise is here to stay. Undoubtedly, in some sense of the word, one can attain a linguistic expert level within a field without full scale practical immersion. In theExpand
Interactional expertise and embodiment
In this four part exchange, Evan Selinger starts by stating that Collins’s empirical evidence in respect of linguistic socialization and its bearing on artificial intelligence and expertise isExpand
Active and latent social groups and their interactional expertise
As a part of their normative theory of expertise, Harry Collins and Robert Evans proposed that interactional expertise forms the third kind of knowledge, located between formal propositionalExpand
Developing a Theoretical Scaffolding for Interactional Competence: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation into Competence Versus Expertise
This chapter argues that it is inappropriate to use the term “interactional expertise” in the context of laboratory ethnographies and engagement studies, such as the Socio-technical IntegrationExpand
Levels of Immersion and Embodiment On the Relation Between Different Types of Practice and the Acquisition of Language
Contemporary neuroscience seems to suggest that conceptual under- standing as in reading and discourse at least in part is perceptually and sensory- somatically corroborated. In other words,Expand
Interactional Imogen: language, practice and the body
Here I try to improve on the available answers to certain long-debated questions and set out some consequences for the answers. Are there limits to the extent to which we can understand theExpand
A Pluralistic Approach to Interactional Expertise
Abstract The concept of interactional expertise – characterized by sociologists Harry Collins and Robert Evans as the ability to speak the language of a discipline without the corresponding abilityExpand


The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus-Collins debate
In order to contest Hubert Dreyfus's claim that having a human body is a necessary condition for exhibiting intelligent behavior in our world, artificial intelligence researcher (henceforth, AI)Expand
Four kinds of knowledge, two (or maybe three) kinds of embodiment, and the question of artificial intelligence
"Begin with practices."' The importance of beginning with practices is a theme that runs through much of Hubert Dreyfus's work on Heidegger, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence . BeginningExpand
Artificial experts - social knowledge and intelligent machines
Sociologist Harry Collins explains what computers can't do, but also studies the ordinary and extraordinary things that they can do, and argues that although machines are limited because they cannot reproduce in symbols what every community knows, the authors give them abilities because of the way they embed them in their society. Expand
Embedded or Embodied? A Review of Hubert Dreyfus' What Computers Still Can't Do
  • H. Collins
  • Computer Science, Mathematics
  • Artif. Intell.
  • 1996
It is argued that Dreyfus makes a ‘professional mistake’, a “philosophical elision”, and a ’sociological error’ in What Computers Can’t Do. Expand
Seeing Voices: A Journey Into the World of the Deaf.
Oliver Sacks has been described (by "The New York Times Book Review") as "one of the great clinical writers of the 20th century," and his books, including the medical classics Migraine andExpand
What Computers Still Can't Do
In defending “symbolic AI”, one development-formalized nonmonotonic reasoning is emphasized, because it illustrates intermittent but definite progress in logic-based AI. Expand
Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood
Introduction - Walking the tight trope 1. Deaf Community 2. Deafness and Deafhood in Western Civilisation: Towards the Development of a New Conceptual Framework 3. Twentieth Century Discourses onExpand
Star Crushing:
This paper presents a case study of a recent controversy among theoretical physicists modelled on case studies of experimental science conducted in recent times by sociologists and historians. TheExpand
Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice
H M Collins is co-author of the widely acclaimed "Frames of Meaning "and Director of the Science Studies Centre at Bath University. He continues his work in the sociology of science with this book, aExpand
The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do
Humans and machines methods and principles morphicity - what the action is a theory of interaction morphicity and human competence writing machine behaviour and human action organizations andExpand