Inter-rater reliability of case-note audit: a systematic review.

@article{Lilford2007InterraterRO,
  title={Inter-rater reliability of case-note audit: a systematic review.},
  author={Richard J. Lilford and Alex Edwards and Alan J Girling and Timothy P Hofer and Gian luca Di Tanna and J. V. Petty and Jon Nicholl},
  journal={Journal of health services research & policy},
  year={2007},
  volume={12 3},
  pages={173-80}
}
OBJECTIVE The quality of clinical care is often assessed by retrospective examination of case-notes (charts, medical records). Our objective was to determine the inter-rater reliability of case-note audit. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the inter-rater reliability of case-note audit. Analysis was restricted to 26 papers reporting comparisons of two or three raters making independent judgements about the quality of care. RESULTS Sixty-six separate comparisons were possible… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
22 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…