Intending to forget is not easy: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Abstract

Previous researches have shown that recognition accuracy is lower for items cued to-be-forgotten (TBF) than to-be-remembered (TBR). Does directed forgetting help people forget more items than non-directed forgetting? Here, we modified the directed forgetting paradigm by adding a non-cue condition (NC). Consequently, non-directed forgetting would occur in NC. Behavioral results showed higher recognition accuracy for TBF than NC items, indicating that directed forgetting is less effective than non-directed forgetting. Electrophysiological results indicated that: (1) Remembered TBF items evoke an increased late positive component (LPC) than remembered NC items; (2) compared with remembered NC items, remembered TBF items showed a pronounced left-lateralized old/new effect and a reduced right-lateralized reversed old/new effect; (3) a right-lateralized reversed old/new effect was observed for forgotten TBF, but it was absent for forgotten NC items. These results demonstrate that the TBF items have a greater memory trace than the NC items. Forgetting cue has little effect of forgetting item from memory, and it might prompt subject to process or at least focus attention on the TBF items.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.03.007

Cite this paper

@article{Gao2016IntendingTF, title={Intending to forget is not easy: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.}, author={Heming Gao and Bihua Cao and Qi Zhang and Mingming Qi and Fuhong Li and Hong Li}, journal={International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology}, year={2016}, volume={104}, pages={1-9} }