Integrating goals after prioritization and evaluation-A Goal-oriented requirements engineering method

@article{Vinay2014IntegratingGA,
  title={Integrating goals after prioritization and evaluation-A Goal-oriented requirements engineering method},
  author={S. Vinay and Shridhar Aithal and Sudhakar G Adiga},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2014},
  volume={abs/1412.2588}
}
Decision support system in Requirements engineering plays an important role in software development life cycle. The relationship between functional and non-functional requirements often plays a crucial role in resolving conflicts or arriving at decisions in requirements engineering phase. Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) methods make a good attempt of addressing these aspects which are helpful in decision support. We propose a GORE method - Integrating goals after prioritization… 
View PDF on arXiv
1 Citations
Background Citations
1

One Citation

Decision traceability in agile software projects
ion. The principle of abstraction means focusing on key relationships and genuinely essential decisions (Book et al., 2016). Book et al. (2016) explain that though this means leaving out details at…

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
A MULTIPLE CHOICE DECISION ANALYSIS: AN INTEGRATED QFD-AHP MODEL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CUSTOMER NEEDS
The aim of this work is to propose a new methodological approach to define customer specifications through the employment of an integrated Quality Function Deployment (QFD) – Analytic Hierarchy…
Comparative study of Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering
TLDR
This paper reviews some of the significant research works done in GORE and may serve as a guide for readers to select an appropriate goal-oriented technique for fulfilling his/her requirements engineering needs.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering Method
TLDR
This work systematically evaluates the KAOS method, and the Objectiver tool, using the major REOs widely accepted as being important attributes of requirements specifications, to answer the need for methods and tools in requirements engineering which are domain specific and can address the main RE objectives.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering Method
TLDR
This work systematically evaluates the KAOS method, and the Objectiver tool, using the major REOs widely accepted as being important attributes of requirements specifications, to answer the need for methods and tools in requirements engineering which are domain specific and can address the main RE objectives.
Goal Oriented Requirement Engineering: A Critical Study of Techniques
  • Shahzad Anwer, N. Ikram
  • Computer Science
    2006 13th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'06)
  • 2006
TLDR
This paper presents and synthesizes the underlying concepts of GORE with respect to coverage of requirement engineering activities and evaluates GORE techniques on the basis of concepts, process and claimed advantages.
Non-functional requirements in industry - three case studies adopting an experience-based NFR method
TLDR
Each case study tells its own story about how the elicitation of NFR in industry can work, and the paper discusses the different settings and gives a comparison of the different lessons learned from the case studies.
Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour
TLDR
The paper compares the main approaches to goal modeling, goal specification and goal-based reasoning in the many activities of the requirements engineering process and suggests what a goal-oriented requirements engineering method may look like.
Selecting an appropriate framework for value-based requirements prioritization
TLDR
This paper presents the approach in selecting the most appropriate value based requirements prioritization framework as per the requirements of the authors' stakeholders and a single framework was selected, validated by requirements engineers and project managers and deployed by a major IT player in India.
Clear justification of modeling decisions for goal-oriented requirements engineering
TLDR
The paper proposes the “Goal Argumentation Method (GAM)”, a method that guides argumentation and justification of modeling choices during the construction or critique of goal model instances and provides practical techniques for the engineer to ensure that requirements appearing both in arguments and in model instance elements are clear.
AGORA: attributed goal-oriented requirements analysis method
  • H. Kaiya, H. Horai, M. Saeki
  • Computer Science
    Proceedings IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering
  • 2002
TLDR
This paper presents an extended version of the goal-oriented requirements analysis method called AGORA, where attribute values, e.g. contribution values and preference matrices, are added to goal graphs, where they allow the analyst to estimate the quality of the resulting requirements specification.
...
...