Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications

@article{Leydesdorff2011IntegratedII,
  title={Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications},
  author={Loet Leydesdorff and L. Bornmann},
  journal={J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.},
  year={2011},
  volume={62},
  pages={2133-2146}
}
  • Loet Leydesdorff, L. Bornmann
  • Published 2011
  • Computer Science, Physics
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • In bibliometrics, the association of “impact” with central-tendency statistics is mistaken. Impacts add up, and citation curves therefore should be integrated instead of averaged. For example, the journals MIS Quarterly and Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology differ by a factor of 2 in terms of their respective impact factors (IF), but the journal with the lower IF has the higher impact. Using percentile ranks (e.g., top-1%, top-10%, etc.), an Integrated… CONTINUE READING
    138 Citations
    An Integrated Impact Indicator (I3): A New Definition of "Impact" with Policy Relevance
    • 23
    • PDF
    Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers
    • 63
    • PDF
    The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor
    • 7
    • PDF
    How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts
    • 29
    • PDF
    Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management
    • 51
    • PDF
    Introducing sub-impact factor (SIF-) sequences and an aggregated SIF-indicator for journal ranking
    • 9
    • Highly Influenced
    Evaluating journal performance metrics
    • G. Prathap
    • Mathematics, Computer Science
    • Scientometrics
    • 2012
    • 2
    • Highly Influenced
    Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3)
    • 28
    • PDF
    The citation-based indicator and combined impact indicator - New options for measuring impact
    • 7
    • PDF
    Can the technological impact of academic journals be evaluated? The practice of non-patent reference (NPR) analysis
    • 8

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 57 REFERENCES
    How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?
    • 126
    • PDF
    Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
    • 161
    • PDF
    Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations
    • 117
    Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization
    • 129
    Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects
    • 76
    • PDF
    Lifting the crown - citation z-score
    • 225
    Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations
    • 174
    • PDF
    Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.
    • 2,200
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF