Insensitivity to Sample Bias : Generalizing From Atypical Cases

@inproceedings{Hamill2005InsensitivityTS,
  title={Insensitivity to Sample Bias : Generalizing From Atypical Cases},
  author={Ruth Hamill and Timothy D Wilson},
  year={2005}
}
Two experiments were conducted to determine whether subjects take into account the representativeness of a sample before generalizing from the sample to a population. Subjects were presented with vivid one-case samples of populations—a welfare recipient in one study and a prison guard in another. Subjects were then asked to rate the population (of welfare recipients or prison guards) on a number of dimensions. Exposure to the sample case influenced attitudes about the population whether… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 41 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 references

Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment

R. E. Nisbett, L. D. Ross
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, • 1980

Causal schemata in judgments under uncertainty

A. Tversky, D. Kahneman
Progress in social psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, • 1978

Epistemics: The regulative theory of cognition

A. I. Goldman
The Journal of Philosophy, • 1978

Judged frequency of lethal events

S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, M. Layman, B. Combs
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, • 1978

Scientific deduction—Evidence is not necessarily informative: A reply to Wells and Harvey

E. Borgida
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, • 1978
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…