Informed Choice and PGD to Prevent “Intersex Conditions”

@article{Nisker2013InformedCA,
  title={Informed Choice and PGD to Prevent “Intersex Conditions”},
  author={J. Nisker},
  journal={The American Journal of Bioethics},
  year={2013},
  volume={13},
  pages={47 - 49}
}
  • J. Nisker
  • Published 2013
  • Medicine
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
I continue to “worry”1 about how difference becomes pathologized when physicians, medical procedures, and researchers (laboratory and philosophy/social) focus on preventing children of particular characteristics (Mykitiuk and Nisker 2010; Nisker 2012; Nisker and Gore-Langton 1995). I continue to worry about how informed choice regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is treated lightly compared with informed choice regarding amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) both in the… Expand
4 Citations

Topics from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Gender Eugenics? The Ethics of PGD for Intersex Conditions
  • R. Sparrow
  • Medicine
  • The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
  • 2013
  • 25
Consequences of the ESPE/LWPES guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of disorders of sex development.
  • 101
Prenatal treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia: risks outweigh benefits.
  • 39
Information-sharing to promote informed choice in prenatal screening in the spirit of the SOGC clinical practice guideline: a proposal for an alternative model.
  • 29
Female genital appearance: ‘normality’ unfolds
  • 287
  • PDF
From Calcedonies to Orchids: Plays promoting humanity in health policy
  • Toronto, ON, Canada: Iguana Press.
  • 2012
University Sparrow (2013b) argues that parents have ethical reasons to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to attempt to prevent the birth of a child with an intersex condition
  • While we appreciate Sparrow’s efforts,
  • 2013
...
1
2
...