Informed Choice and PGD to Prevent “Intersex Conditions”

@article{Nisker2013InformedCA,
  title={Informed Choice and PGD to Prevent “Intersex Conditions”},
  author={J. Nisker},
  journal={The American Journal of Bioethics},
  year={2013},
  volume={13},
  pages={47 - 49}
}
  • J. Nisker
  • Published 2013
  • Medicine
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • I continue to “worry”1 about how difference becomes pathologized when physicians, medical procedures, and researchers (laboratory and philosophy/social) focus on preventing children of particular characteristics (Mykitiuk and Nisker 2010; Nisker 2012; Nisker and Gore-Langton 1995). I continue to worry about how informed choice regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is treated lightly compared with informed choice regarding amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) both in the… CONTINUE READING
    4 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
    Gender Eugenics? The Ethics of PGD for Intersex Conditions
    • R. Sparrow
    • Medicine
    • The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
    • 2013
    • 25
    Consequences of the ESPE/LWPES guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of disorders of sex development.
    • 100
    Prenatal treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia: risks outweigh benefits.
    • 39
    Information-sharing to promote informed choice in prenatal screening in the spirit of the SOGC clinical practice guideline: a proposal for an alternative model.
    • 29
    Female genital appearance: ‘normality’ unfolds
    • 285
    • PDF
    From Calcedonies to Orchids: Plays promoting humanity in health policy
    • Toronto, ON, Canada: Iguana Press.
    • 2012
    University Sparrow (2013b) argues that parents have ethical reasons to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to attempt to prevent the birth of a child with an intersex condition
    • While we appreciate Sparrow’s efforts,
    • 2013