Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons?

  title={Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons?},
  author={S. Huck and J. Oechssler},
Recently, the theory of informational cascades has been tested in an experiment by Anderson and Holt (1997) who report that their data support the theory amazingly well. In this note we report on an experiment designed to find out whether observed cascades are indeed due to rational Bayesian updating. However, we find little support for rational updating. The simple heuristic "follow your own signal" does much better in explaining our data than Bayesian rationality. 
116 Citations

Tables from this paper

Information Cascades with Informative Ratings: An Experimental Test
  • PDF
Do We Learn from Mistakes of Others? A Test of Observational Learning in the Bandit Problem
  • PDF
Limited Depth of Reasoning and Failure of Cascade Formation in the Laboratory
  • 243
  • PDF
Do individuals recognize cascade behavior of others? : An experimental study
  • 26
  • PDF


Information Cascades in the Laboratory
  • 768
  • PDF
Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic
  • 576
A Simple Model of Herd Behavior
  • 5,256
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades
  • 5,679
  • PDF
Status quo bias in decision making
  • 4,066
  • PDF
Individual Decision Making
  • 934
Informational Aggregation with Random Ordering: Cascades and Overcon®dence, Mimeo. Mannheim: University of Mannheim
  • 1999
How to play 3 3 games, Paper
  • 1998
\How to Play 3x3 Games
  • Paper presented at the ESA 1998 Annual Meeting in Mannheim
  • 1998