Influencing group participation with a shared display

@article{DiMicco2004InfluencingGP,
  title={Influencing group participation with a shared display},
  author={Joan Morris DiMicco and Anna Pandolfo and Walter Bender},
  journal={Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work},
  year={2004}
}
During face-to-face interactions, groups frequently overly rely on the dominant viewpoint to lead the group in its decision-making process. [...] Key Result While influencing the quantity of time someone speaks is not directly equivalent to influencing the topics discussed, we suggest that this approach of providing peripheral displays of social information is promising for improving certain types of group interactions.Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Changing small group interaction through visual reflections of social behavior
People collaborating in groups have potential to produce higher-quality output than individuals working alone, due to the pooling of resources, information, and skills. Yet social psychologists haveExpand
The Impact of Increased Awareness While Face-to-Face
TLDR
Second Messenger, a system of dynamic awareness displays that reveal speaker participation patterns in a face-to-face discussion, is presented, suggesting that awareness applications bring about systematic changes in group communication styles. Expand
Automatic Relational Reporting to Support Group Dynamics
TLDR
The complexity of social dynamics occurring in small group interactions often hinders the performance of teams, and external interventions by experts such as facilitators and trainers are commonly employed. Expand
An Interactive Table for Supporting Participation Balance in Face-to-Face Collaboration
TLDR
It is shown that Reflect leads to more balanced collaboration, but only under certain conditions, and different effects the table has on over- and under-participators. Expand
Multimodal support to group dynamics
TLDR
A particular scenario, in which meeting participants receive multimedia feedback on their relational behaviour, is discussed, as a first step towards increasing self-awareness. Expand
Vote and Be Heard : Adding BackChannel Cues to Social Mirrors
In face-to-face group situations, social pressure and organizational hierarchy relegate the less outspoken into silence, often resulting in fewer voices, fewer ideas, and group-think. However, inExpand
The Effects Visual Feedback on Social Behavior during Decision Making Meetings
TLDR
The design and evaluation of a visualization that provides feedback for meeting participants on their social behavior (Social Mirror) suggest that the Social Mirror leads to changes in the social behavior of the participant; in particularly due to the agreement visualization. Expand
Presence in the age of social networks: augmenting mediated environments with feedback on group activity
TLDR
The results show that feedback improved the exchange of messages with respect to the control condition and that this effect was only partially captured by self-reported measures. Expand
Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display
TLDR
The service measures and visualizes properties of participants' behaviour that are relevant to the social dynamics of the meeting: speaking time and gaze behaviour and found that the presence of the feedback about speaking time influenced the behaviour of the participants in such a way that it made over-participator to behave less dominant and under-participators to become more active. Expand
Vote and Be Heard: Adding Back-Channel Signals to Social Mirrors
TLDR
Conversation Votes is described, a tabletop system that augments verbal conversation with a shared anonymous back-channel to highlight agreement and shows that anonymous visual back-channels provide a medium for the underrepresented voices of a conversation and balances interaction among all participants. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆
Abstract Three experiments explored the effects of computer-mediated communication on communication efficiency, participation, interpersonal behavior, and group choice. Groups of three members wereExpand
The Eyes Have It : Minority Influence in Face-To-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Discussion
Results of an experiment comparing face-to-face groups with anonymous and identified computer-supported groups challenged theoretical arguments (V. S. Rao & S. L. Jarvenpaa, 1991) that computer-basedExpand
Enhancement of Dominant Attitudes in Group Discussion.
Two studies were performed in an attempt to generalize the risky-cautiousshift phenomenon to attitudes and to test "information exchange" and "mutual reinforcement" explanations ofExpand
Styles of group discussion in computer-mediated decision making
This study investigated the claim that keyboard-based computer-mediated group discussion suppresses normative influence relative to informational influence. In a simulated panel of inquiry presentedExpand
The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups
TLDR
A striking and unexpected result was that "first" advocacy was shared by high-and low-status members in discussions using electronic mail, which resulted in increased equality of influence across status and expertise. Expand
Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media
This experiment investigated the conditions under which a member with information critical for making the best group decision will positively influence the group's final choice. The impact of twoExpand
Collaborative technology and group process feedback: their impact on interactive sequences in meetings
TLDR
If group process feedback is given to people participating in a computer-supported collaborative technology meeting, the number of socio-emotional interactive sequences increases significantly above the expected level determined by log-linear analysis, in contrast to when using collaborative computer technology alone (no feedback). Expand
The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups.
Kenneth Bettenhausen and J. Keith Murnighan This paper examines the development of norms in newly formed groups. The behavior of 19 decision-making groups provided the basis for a model of normExpand
Group decision making and communication technology
Abstract Advances in computing and telecommunications technology are changing how people can meet and make group decisions. Technological changes help people cross physical, social, and psychologicalExpand
Second messenger: increasing the visibility of minority viewpoints with a face-to-face collaboration tool
This paper introduces the application Second Messenger, a tool for supporting face-to-face meetings and discussions. Second Messenger uses a speech-recognition engine as an input method and outputsExpand
...
1
2
3
...