Influencing group participation with a shared display

@article{DiMicco2004InfluencingGP,
  title={Influencing group participation with a shared display},
  author={Joan Morris DiMicco and Anna Pandolfo and Walter Bender},
  journal={Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work},
  year={2004}
}
During face-to-face interactions, groups frequently overly rely on the dominant viewpoint to lead the group in its decision-making process. [] Key Result While influencing the quantity of time someone speaks is not directly equivalent to influencing the topics discussed, we suggest that this approach of providing peripheral displays of social information is promising for improving certain types of group interactions.

Figures and Tables from this paper

Changing small group interaction through visual reflections of social behavior

People collaborating in groups have potential to produce higher-quality output than individuals working alone, due to the pooling of resources, information, and skills. Yet social psychologists have

The Impact of Increased Awareness While Face-to-Face

TLDR
Second Messenger, a system of dynamic awareness displays that reveal speaker participation patterns in a face-to-face discussion, is presented, suggesting that awareness applications bring about systematic changes in group communication styles.

Automatic Relational Reporting to Support Group Dynamics

TLDR
The complexity of social dynamics occurring in small group interactions often hinders the performance of teams, and external interventions by experts such as facilitators and trainers are commonly employed.

An Interactive Table for Supporting Participation Balance in Face-to-Face Collaboration

TLDR
It is shown that Reflect leads to more balanced collaboration, but only under certain conditions, and different effects the table has on over- and under-participators.

Vote and Be Heard : Adding BackChannel Cues to Social Mirrors

In face-to-face group situations, social pressure and organizational hierarchy relegate the less outspoken into silence, often resulting in fewer voices, fewer ideas, and group-think. However, in

Presence in the age of social networks: augmenting mediated environments with feedback on group activity

TLDR
The results show that feedback improved the exchange of messages with respect to the control condition and that this effect was only partially captured by self-reported measures.

The Effects Visual Feedback on Social Behavior during Decision Making Meetings

TLDR
The design and evaluation of a visualization that provides feedback for meeting participants on their social behavior (Social Mirror) suggest that the Social Mirror leads to changes in the social behavior of the participant; in particularly due to the agreement visualization.

Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display

TLDR
The service measures and visualizes properties of participants' behaviour that are relevant to the social dynamics of the meeting: speaking time and gaze behaviour and found that the presence of the feedback about speaking time influenced the behaviour of the participants in such a way that it made over-participator to behave less dominant and under-participators to become more active.

Vote and Be Heard: Adding Back-Channel Signals to Social Mirrors

TLDR
Conversation Votes is described, a tabletop system that augments verbal conversation with a shared anonymous back-channel to highlight agreement and shows that anonymous visual back-channels provide a medium for the underrepresented voices of a conversation and balances interaction among all participants.

Reflect: A Table for Self-Regulation in Face-to-Face Meetings

Can we design a table that would transform everyday conversations? Can we improve group collaboration processes by displaying relevant information about ongoing social dynamics? We are interested in
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆

The Eyes Have It : Minority Influence in Face-To-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Discussion

Results of an experiment comparing face-to-face groups with anonymous and identified computer-supported groups challenged theoretical arguments (V. S. Rao & S. L. Jarvenpaa, 1991) that computer-based

Enhancement of Dominant Attitudes in Group Discussion.

Two studies were performed in an attempt to generalize the risky-cautiousshift phenomenon to attitudes and to test "information exchange" and "mutual reinforcement" explanations of

Styles of group discussion in computer-mediated decision making

This study investigated the claim that keyboard-based computer-mediated group discussion suppresses normative influence relative to informational influence. In a simulated panel of inquiry presented

The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups

TLDR
A striking and unexpected result was that "first" advocacy was shared by high-and low-status members in discussions using electronic mail, which resulted in increased equality of influence across status and expertise.

Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media

This experiment investigated the conditions under which a member with information critical for making the best group decision will positively influence the group's final choice. The impact of two

Collaborative technology and group process feedback: their impact on interactive sequences in meetings

TLDR
If group process feedback is given to people participating in a computer-supported collaborative technology meeting, the number of socio-emotional interactive sequences increases significantly above the expected level determined by log-linear analysis, in contrast to when using collaborative computer technology alone (no feedback).

The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups.

Kenneth Bettenhausen and J. Keith Murnighan This paper examines the development of norms in newly formed groups. The behavior of 19 decision-making groups provided the basis for a model of norm

Group decision making and communication technology

Second messenger: increasing the visibility of minority viewpoints with a face-to-face collaboration tool

This paper introduces the application Second Messenger, a tool for supporting face-to-face meetings and discussions. Second Messenger uses a speech-recognition engine as an input method and outputs