Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report.

@article{Ivanoff1999InfluenceOV,
  title={Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report.},
  author={C. Ivanoff and K. Gr{\"o}ndahl and L. Sennerby and C. Bergstr{\"o}m and U. Lekholm},
  journal={The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants},
  year={1999},
  volume={14 2},
  pages={
          173-80
        }
}
  • C. Ivanoff, K. Gröndahl, +2 authors U. Lekholm
  • Published 1999
  • Medicine, Materials Science
  • The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
  • Sixty-seven patients ranging in age from 16 to 86 years were included in this 3- to 5-year retrospective report focusing on implant survival and marginal bone remodeling in relation to implant diameter. A total of 299 Brånemark implants (3.75-mm diameter: 141; 4.0-mm diameter: 61; 5.0-mm diameter: 97) were placed in 16 completely and 51 partially edentulous arches. Seven of the 141 implants in the 3.75-mm-diameter group failed (5%). The corresponding value for the 4.0-mm-wide implants was 2 of… CONTINUE READING
    Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.
    • 419
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES