• Corpus ID: 17160499

Influence of Study Type on Twitter Activity for Medical Research Papers

@article{Andersen2015InfluenceOS,
  title={Influence of Study Type on Twitter Activity for Medical Research Papers},
  author={Jens Peter Andersen and Stefanie Haustein},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2015},
  volume={abs/1507.00154}
}
Twitter has been identified as one of the most popular and promising altmetrics data sources, as it possibly reflects a broader use of research articles by the general public. Several factors, such as document age, scientific discipline, number of authors and document type, have been shown to affect the number of tweets received by scientific documents. The particular meaning of tweets mentioning scholarly papers is, however, not entirely understood and their validity as impact indicators… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Scholarly Twitter metrics
  • S. Haustein
  • Education
    Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators
  • 2019
TLDR
This chapter considers what types of scholarly documents are popular on Twitter, and how, when and by whom they are diffused in order to understand what tweets to scholarly documents measure.
The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations)
TLDR
This is the first study that tests the performance of research journals on Twitter according to their handles, observing how the dissemination of content in this microblogging network influences the citation of their papers.
To What Extent Does the Open Access Status of Articles Predict Their Social Media Visibility? A Case Study of Life Sciences and Biomedicine
This study aimed to determine whether, and to what extent, the OA status and OA type of articles can predict their social media visibility, when controlling for a considerable number of important
An analysis of COVID-19 article dissemination by Twitter compared to citation rates
TLDR
This study identified article characteristics that are correlated with the dissemination of articles on Twitter, such as 2018 journal impact factor, continent of the corresponding author, topic, and open access status, and highlights the importance of altmetrics in periods of rapidly expanding research,such as the COVID-19 pandemic to localize highly disseminated articles.
Selective tweeting of COVID-19 articles: Does title or abstract positivity influence dissemination?
TLDR
COVID-19 articles with non-positive titles are preferentially tweeted, while abstract positivity does not influence tweet rate.
Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education
TLDR
It is suggested that several altmetrics outlets are positively associated with citations, and that public accessibility, holding all other independent variables constant, is positively related to article access.
Do 'altmetric mentions' follow Power Laws? Evidence from social media mention data in Altmetric.com
TLDR
It is concluded that altmetric distributions also follow power laws with a fairly good fit over a wide range of values, and more rigorous methods of determination may not be necessary at present.
#MedEd: exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education
TLDR
It is suggested that several altmetrics outlets are positively associated with citations, and that public accessibility, holding all other independent variables constant, is positively related to article access.
On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles
TLDR
Examination of factors associated with future citation and altmetric counts to a paper shows that Journal impact factor and international collaboration are the two factors that significantly associate with increased citation counts and with all altmetrics scores.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature
TLDR
This article aims to provide systematic evidence about how often Twitter is used to disseminate information about journal articles in the biomedical sciences by evaluating the degree to which certain journals, disciplines, and specialties were represented on Twitter and how far tweets correlate with citation impact.
Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact
  • G. Eysenbach
  • Computer Science
    Journal of medical Internet research
  • 2011
TLDR
Tweets can predict highly cited articles within the first 3 days of article publication, and the proposed twimpact factor may be a useful and timely metric to measure uptake of research findings and to filter research findings resonating with the public in real time.
Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns
TLDR
Findings suggest that factors driving social media and citations are different and social media metrics cannot actually be seen as alternatives to citations; at most, they may function as complements to other type of indicators.
Tweeting Links to Academic Articles
TLDR
Tweets containing links to scholarly articles generally provide little more than publicity, and so whilst tweet counts may provide evidence of the popularity of an article, the contents of the tweets themselves are unlikely to give deep insights into scientists' reactions to publications, except perhaps in special cases.
Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter
TLDR
The results show that automated Twitter accounts create a considerable amount of tweets to scientific articles and that they behave differently than common social bots, which has critical implications for the use of raw tweet counts in research evaluation and assessment.
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
TLDR
Comparisons between citations and metric values for articles published at different times, even within the same year, can remove or reverse this association and so publishers and scientometricians should consider the effect of time when using altmetrics to rank articles.
Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact
TLDR
This study explores the properties of these social media-based metrics or "altmetrics", sampling 24,331 articles published by the Public Library of Science and finds that that different indicators vary greatly in activity.
Social media use in the research workflow
TLDR
The paper reports on a major international questionnaire survey that investigated the use of social media in the research workflow, showing that social media impact on all points of the research lifecycle, from identifying research opportunities to disseminating findings at the end.
Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
TLDR
A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley to show in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics.
Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective
TLDR
The results confirm that the presence and density of social media altmetrics counts are still very low and not very frequent among scientific publications, with 15%–24% of the publications presenting some altmetric activity and concentrated on the most recent publications, although their presence is increasing over time.
...
...