Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers

@inproceedings{Rabin2000InferenceBB,
  title={Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers},
  author={Matthew Rabin},
  year={2000}
}
Many people believe in the Law of Small Numbers, exaggerating the degree to which a small sample resembles the population from which it is drawn. To model this, I assume that a person exaggerates the likelihood that a short sequence of i.i.d. signals resembles the long-run rate at which those signals are generated. Such a person believes in the gambler's fallacy , thinking early draws of one signal increase the odds of next drawing other signals. When uncertain about the rate, the person over… 

A Model of Non-Belief in the Law of Large Numbers

People believe that, even in very large samples, proportions of binary signals might depart significantly from the population mean. We model this "non-belief in the Law of Large Numbers" by assuming

An Axiomatic Approach to the Law of Small Numbers ∗

With beliefs over the outcomes of coin-tosses as our primitive, we formalize the Law of Small Numbers (Tversky and Kahneman (1974)) by an axiom that expresses a belief that the sample mean of any

Field Evidence on the Law of Small Numbers

The law of small numbers is the fallacious belief that even small samples should closely resemble the parent distribution from which the sample is drawn. It is expressed through two opposite

Do Sophisticated Investors Believe in the Law of Small Numbers?

Believers in the law of small numbers tend to overinfer the outcome of a random process after a small series of observations. They believe that small samples replicate the probability distribution

A MODEL OF NONBELIEF IN THE LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS.

This work model this "non-belief in the Law of Large Numbers" by assuming that a person believes that proportions in any given sample might be determined by a rate different than the true rate.

Inference from Streaks in Random Outcomes: Experimental Evidence on Beliefs in Regime Shifting and the Law of Small Numbers

It is found that as the perception of the randomness of the outcome-generating process increases, subjects are more likely to predict reversals of current streaks, and results of a “test-of-fit” analysis based on structural estimation of each model favor the model in Rabin.

Biased Beliefs About Random Samples: Evidence from Two Integrated Experiments

This paper describes results of a pair of incentivized experiments on biases in judgments about random samples. Consistent with the Law of Small Numbers (LSN), participants exaggerated the likelihood

Who “Believes” in the Gambler’s Fallacy and Why?

Support is provided for a general account of randomness perception in which biases are actually apt reflections of environmental statistics under experiential constraints and deeper insight into human cognition may be gained if, instead of dismissing apparent biases as failings, the authors assume humans are rational under constraints.

Misconceptions of Chance : Evidence from an Integrated Experiment

This paper describes results of an incentivized experiment investigating biases that jointly imply logically inconsistent beliefs about random samples. We find that people think past streaks predict

Surprised by the Gambler's and Hot Hand Fallacies? A Truth in the Law of Small Numbers

We prove that a subtle but substantial bias exists in a standard measure of the conditional dependence of present outcomes on streaks of past outcomes in sequential data. The magnitude of this novel
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 71 REFERENCES

BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS

“Suppose you have run an experiment on 20 subjects, and have obtained a significant result which confirms your theory ( z = 2.23, p If you feel that the probability is somewhere around .85, you may

Judgments of and by Representativeness

Several years ago, we presented an analysis of judgment under uncertainty that related subjective probabilities and intuitive predictions to expectations and impressions about representativeness. Two

On the psychology of prediction

In this paper, we explore the rules that determine intuitive predictions and judgments of confidence and contrast these rules to the normative principles of statistical prediction. Two classes of

Typicality and reasoning fallacies

The work of Tversky and Kahneman on intuitive probability judgment leads to the following prediction: The judged probability that an instance belongs to a category is an increasing function of the

First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias

Psychological research indicates that people have a cognitive bias that leads them to misinterpret new information as supporting previously held hypotheses. We model such confirmatory bias in a

Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence

Judgmental extrapolation and the salience of change

People may often forecast using cognitive procedures that resemble formal time-series extrapolation models. A model of judgmental extrapolation based on exponential smoothing is proposed in which the

Notes: The Gambler's Fallacy in Lottery Play

The "gambler's fallacy" is the belief that the probability of an event is lowered when that event has recently occurred, even though the probability of the event is objectively known to be
...