Induction of labour: does it increase the risk of cesarean delivery?

@article{Caughey2014InductionOL,
  title={Induction of labour: does it increase the risk of cesarean delivery?},
  author={A. Caughey},
  journal={BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics \& Gynaecology},
  year={2014},
  volume={121},
  pages={658 - 661}
}
  • A. Caughey
  • Published 2014
  • Medicine
  • BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
There has been great focus recently on the dangers of induction of labour prior to 39 weeks of gestation, with numerous authors reporting no improvement to patients, and perhaps some harm. It has been demonstrated that although education is a helpful component in preventing elective induction of labour, a ‘hard stop’ on elective inductions appears to be the best approach. Unfortunately, such a hard stop, although effective, is a crude way to reduce inductions of labour, particularly as we are… Expand
Comparison of outcomes between induction of labor and spontaneous labor for term breech - A systemic review and meta analysis.
Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta‐analysis
  • A. Sotiriadis, S. Petousis, +5 authors J. Hyett
  • Medicine
  • Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • 2019
A Nurse's Guide to Supporting Physiologic Birth.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Induction of Labour for Improving Birth Outcomes for Women at or Beyond Term
Term Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management
  • J. Glantz
  • Medicine
  • Obstetrics and gynecology
  • 2010
Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women.
...
1
2
3
...