Indo‐Sri Lankan security perceptions: Divergences and convergences

  title={Indo‐Sri Lankan security perceptions: Divergences and convergences},
  author={P. Murthy},
  journal={Strategic Analysis},
  pages={343 - 360}
  • P. Murthy
  • Published 2000
  • Political Science
  • Strategic Analysis
  • For a student of South Asia, any mention of Indo-Sri Lanka security perceptions or for that matter a reference to the wider IndcnSri Lanka relations, immediately brings to mind the Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement of 1987 and the events preceding it and following it. One of the most difficult periods in the bilateral relations of the two countries, it was characterised by mistrust and suspicion. Only after the withdrawal of the IPKF (Indian Peace Keeping Force) in March 1990 can it be said that… CONTINUE READING
    7 Citations
    India and its neighbours: The 1990s and beyond
    • 9
    Sri Lanka's ‘War within’ and India
    • 4
    Defeating the Modern Asymmetric Threat
    • 6
    Issues Across the Palk Strait sans the LTTE
    • 1
    • PDF
    Growing Mutuality in India-Sri Lanka Relations


    Sri Lanka's Policy Towards China: Legacy of the Past and Prospects for the Future
    • 3
    Pangs of Proximity: India and Sri Lanka′s Ethnic Crisis
    • 49
    • PDF
    For details on other factors refer
      For more details on the nature of interaction that has taken place and the close association of the British and Indian Navy, refer to the chapter
        Indian Institute of International Affairs pamphlet
        • Panniker is considered to be the major proponent of such views. For details refer K.M. Panikkar
        Indian intervention in Sri Lanka: The role of India's intelligence agencies
        • 33
        Indo Ceylonese Pact and the 'Stateless' Persons in Ceylon", in Verinder Grover ed
        • Encyclopedia of SAARC Nations, Sri Lanka,
        • 1994
        Intemationalisation of the Tamil Conflict (And its Implications)
        • South Asia, Journal of South Asian Studies, special issue
        • 1997
        It had fought no great battles. It had accumulated few regiments honours. Its units had not been able to build pride based on long service or difficult campaign
        • 14. Ibid