Individuation Motivation and Face Experience Can Operate Jointly to Produce the Own-Race Bias

@article{Young2012IndividuationMA,
  title={Individuation Motivation and Face Experience Can Operate Jointly to Produce the Own-Race Bias},
  author={Steven G. Young and Kurt Hugenberg},
  journal={Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={3},
  pages={80 - 87}
}
The own-race bias (ORB) is the tendency for perceivers to better recognize own-race than cross-race (CR) faces. Perceptual approaches to understanding this effect suggest that perceivers typically have low levels of processing experience with CR faces, resulting in poor recognition memory. However, social–cognitive models have demonstrated that perceiver motivation can also influence CR recognition accuracy. The current work bridges these two literatures by exploring how participants' CR… 

Figures from this paper

Poor recognition of other-race faces cannot always be explained by a lack of effort
ABSTRACT People are generally better at recognizing own-race than other-race faces. This “other-race effect” is very well established although the underlying causes are much debated. Social-cognitive
Own-group bias in face recognition
: Research about face recognition shows that people are better at recognizing faces of their own groups (e.g. race, sex, and age) compared to faces of other groups. In recent years, researchers have
How expertise and motivation affect the recognition of own- and other-race faces : behavioural and electrophysiological evidence
Humans have difficulties recognising other-race faces, and this own-race bias (ORB) has been explained in terms of either reduced perceptual expertise with other-race faces or socio-cognitive and
Of Kith and Kin: Perceptual Enrichment, Expectancy, and Reciprocity in Face Perception
TLDR
This argument is that differential experience with a racial ingroup promotes both perceptual enrichment, including richer, more well-integrated visual representations of ingroup relative to outgroup faces, and expectancies that ingroup faces are normative, which influence subsequent visual processing.
Choosing Your Words and Pictures Wisely: When Do Individuation Instructions Reduce the Cross-Race Effect?
Summary Recognition accuracy for faces of an individual's own race typically exceeds recognition accuracy for other-race faces. The categorization–individuation model (Hugenberg, Young, Bernstein,
The impact of value-directed remembering on the own-race bias.
A Synthetic Perspective on the Own-Race Bias in Eyewitness Identification
Perceivers show worse memory for other-race than own-race faces. Much of the interest in this own-race bias (ORB) stems from the problems that it may introduce in eyewitness misidentification. Here
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit
Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis.
TLDR
This work made identical ambiguous-race morphed faces look either Asian or Caucasian by presenting them in Caucasian or Asian face contexts, respectively, but this perceived-race manipulation had no effect on either discrimination or memory for the ambiguous- race faces, despite the presence of the usual OREs in discrimination and recognition of unambiguous Asian and Caucasian faces in the participant population.
Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit.
  • D. Levin
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. General
  • 2000
TLDR
These findings support a new explanation for the cross-race (CR) recognition deficit based on feature coding differences between CR and SR faces, and appear incompatible with similarity-based models of face categories.
The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit.
TLDR
A new theoretical framework for the other-race effect is proposed, which argues that the effect results from a confluence of social categorization, motivated individuation, and perceptual experience, and offers not only a parsimonious account of both classic and recent evidence for category-based biases in face recognition but also links the ORE to broader evidence and theory in social cognition and face perception.
Not so black and white: memory for ambiguous group members.
TLDR
Memory for biracial individuals seems to involve a flexible person construal process shaped by motivational factors, suggesting that uncertainty provides the motivational context for discounting ambiguous faces in memory.
Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race
TLDR
This work tested whether the integration of facial features into a whole representation—holistic processing—was larger for SR than OR faces in Caucasians and Asians without life experience with OR faces, and found that SR faces are processed more holistically than Or faces.
When Do Own-Group Biases in Face Recognition Occur? Encoding versus Post-Encoding
The Own-Group Bias in face recognition (the tendency to better recognize members of in-groups relative to out-groups) is a well-documented phenomenon in face perception. Although several theoretical
Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.
TLDR
The results are largely consistent with the hypothesis that expertise is associated with greater use of configural information in faces, and a larger own race inversion effect was found for recognition accuracy.
...
...