Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory

@article{Brewer2012IndividualDI,
  title={Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory},
  author={Gene A. Brewer and Nash Unsworth},
  journal={Journal of Memory and Language},
  year={2012},
  volume={66},
  pages={407-415}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Individual Differences in Long-Term Memory
TLDR
It is demonstrated that individual differences in LTM abilities are represented by various lower order factors based on criterial tasks as well as by a more general higher-order LTM factor.
The Benefits of Retrieval Practice Depend on Item Difficulty and Intelligence
TLDR
Recommendations to engage in retrieval practice should take into consideration the interactive effects of to-be-learned materials and individual differences in the learners, which suggests that the benefit of retrieval practice varies with item difficulty and participant abilities.
Individual Differences in the Delayed Execution of Prospective Memories
TLDR
Examination of individual differences in prospective memory between young adults with high versus low working memory capacity when they had to momentarily delay their intentions for either 6 or 42 s suggests that prospective memory performance is generally impaired across all retention intervals in low-W MC individuals, and that high-WMC individuals may be better able to retrieve the intention from long-term memory even when attention is interrupted by intervening activities.
Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity
TLDR
Final cued recall performance was better for tested items than for restudied items after both 10 minutes and 2 days, particularly for longer study–test lags.
Retrieval Practice: Beneficial for All Students or Moderated by Individual Differences?
Retrieval practice is a learning technique that is known to produce enhanced long-term memory retention when compared to several other techniques. This difference in learning outcome is commonly
The Testing Effect and Its Relation to Working Memory Capacity and Personality Characteristics
Retrieval practice is known to lead to better retention of a to-be-learned material than restudy (i.e., the testing effect). However, few studies have investigated retrieval practice in relation to
The Forward Testing Effect is Reliable and Independent of Learners’ Working Memory Capacity
The forward testing effect refers to the finding that retrieval practice of previously studied information enhances learning and retention of subsequently studied other information. While most of the
Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring
TLDR
Examination of individual differences in output monitoring abilities in a group of younger adults differing in attention control (AC) and episodic memory (EM) abilities showed that AC ability uniquely predicted successful cue detection on the first presentation, whereas EM ability uniquely predicting successful output monitoring on the second presentation.
EFFECT OF PRACTICE SCHEDULES ON CONCEPT & CATEGORY LEARNING
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.
TLDR
A framework is used to examine previous individual differences studies of working memory capacity, and new evidence is examined on the basis of predictions of the framework to performance on immediate free recall.
Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
  • N. Unsworth
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2007
TLDR
It is argued that low-WMC individuals' episodic retrieval deficits are partially due to the fact that these individuals search through a larger set of items than high-W MC individuals.
The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
TLDR
Initial testing was shown to enhance later recollection but leave familiarity unchanged, and this conclusion emerged from three dependent measures: source memory, exclusion performance, and remember/know judgments.
Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering
TLDR
Findings demonstrate that attentive retrieval is critical for learning through remembering and that dividing attention during retrieval may reduce the power of remembering as an encoding event.
Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
  • M. Kane, R. Engle
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2000
TLDR
Results indicate a role for attentional processing, perhaps inhibitory in nature, at encoding and retrieval, and are discussed with respect to theories of WM and prefrontal cortex function.
Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage
TLDR
The relations among processing time, processing accuracy, and storage accuracy from the complex span tasks were examined, in combination with their respective relationships with fluid intelligence, and a complicated pattern of unique and shared variance among the constructs is found.
Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
  • Shana K. Carpenter
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2009
TLDR
Results indicate that the activation of elaborative information-which would occur to a greater extent during testing than restudying--may be one mechanism that underlies the testing effect.
Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect
TLDR
It is suggested that an intervening test may be most beneficial to final retention when it provides more potential for elaborative processing.
...
...