Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.

@article{Bond2008IndividualDI,
  title={Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.},
  author={Charles F. Bond and Bella M. Depaulo},
  journal={Psychological bulletin},
  year={2008},
  volume={134 4},
  pages={
          477-92
        }
}
  • Charles F. Bond, Bella M. Depaulo
  • Published in Psychological bulletin 2008
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The authors report a meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception, confining attention to occasions when people judge strangers' veracity in real-time with no special aids. The authors have developed a statistical technique to correct nominal individual differences for differences introduced by random measurement error. Although researchers have suggested that people differ in the ability to detect lies, psychometric analyses of 247 samples reveal that these ability… CONTINUE READING

    Create an AI-powered research feed to stay up to date with new papers like this posted to ArXiv

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 132 CITATIONS

    A test of the micro‐expressions training tool: Does it improve lie detection?

    VIEW 15 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND, METHODS & RESULTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    Emotions and Deception Detection

    VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
    CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    Website credibility and deceiver credibility: Expanding Prominence-Interpretation Theory

    VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND, RESULTS & METHODS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    Detecting Deception in Second-language Speakers

    VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & RESULTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

    2009
    2020

    CITATION STATISTICS

    • 19 Highly Influenced Citations

    • Averaged 15 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 180 REFERENCES

    Deception Detection Expertise

    VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

    Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception

    • M. G. Aamodt, H. Mitchell
    • Forensic Examiner,
    • 2006
    VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

    Statistical theories of mental test scores

    • F. M. Lord, M. R. Novick
    • 1968
    VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

    Accuracy of deception judgments.

    • Charles F. Bond, Bella M. Depaulo
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
    • 2006
    VIEW 3 EXCERPTS

    Telling lies.

    VIEW 3 EXCERPTS

    Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying.

    VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
    HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL