Indemnity of Legal Fees

  title={Indemnity of Legal Fees},
  author={Avery W. Katz},
This article surveys the effects of legal fee shifting on a variety of decisions arising before and during the litigation process. Section 2 provides a brief survey of the practical situations in which legal fee shifting does and does not arise. Section 3 analyzes the effects of indemnification on the incentives to expend resources in litigated cases. Section 4 examines how indemnification influences the decisions to bring and to defend against suit, and Section 5 assesses its effects on the… Expand
Sequential trials and the English rule
The allocation of trial costs and the way a trial progresses are two important issues in civil procedure. The combination of these two elements has received relatively little attention in the law andExpand
The economic effects of alternative fee shifting rules: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature
The so-called English Rule in § 91 ZPO has a longstanding tradition in German civil litigation. Although this “loser pays”- fee shifting can raise severe problems like sharply reducing access to theExpand
Litigation Cost Allocation Rules, Judicial Detection Skill, and the Propensity to International Trade
The paper analyzes the effects of different litigation cost allocation rules, detection skill of judges (judicial errors), and the mode of enforcement of foreign judgments on the home bias in tradeExpand
Litigation Cost Strategies from Economics
Starting with a simple economic model of the value of civil litigation from each side’s perspective, this paper analyses a wide range of potential litigation cost strategies, settlement offers andExpand
Estimating Effects of English Rule on Litigation Outcomes
The English rule for fee allocation prescribes that the loser of a lawsuit pay the winner’s litigation costs. Economic theory predicts that the English rule discourages settlement, increasesExpand
Litigation Cost Strategies, Settlement Offers and Game Theory
Starting with a simple economic model of the value of civil litigation from each side's perspective, this paper analyses a wide range of potential litigation cost strategies, settlement offers andExpand
Private Enforcement of Statutory and Administrative Law in the United States (and Other Common Law Countries)
Our aim in this paper, which was prepared for an international conference on comparative procedural law to be held in July 2011, is to advance understanding of private enforcement of statutory andExpand
Minimising medical litigation: a review of key tort and legal reforms
  • H. Tan
  • Political Science
  • International Journal of Law in Context
  • 2009
The traditional tort system in medical malpractice is increasingly perceived as being incapable of addressing the mismatch between claims and negligent injuries. Tort reforms have been introduced inExpand
Estimating the Effects of the English Rule on Litigation Outcomes
Abstract The English rule prescribes that the loser of a lawsuit pays the winner's litigation costs. Previous research on the English rule finds that plaintiffs win more often at trial, receiveExpand
Free choice of legal fee shifting rules?
In every country in the world parties to private litigation are subject to a predetermined fee shifting regime. While there are no institutionalized opt-out provisions so far, we demonstrate thatExpand


Indemnity, Settlement, and Litigation: Comment and Extension
  • P. Hersch
  • Economics
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
  • 1990
IN a recent article in this journal, John Hause presented a model of how settlement rates are affected by the indemnification rule in effect.1 Under the American rule each party pays its ownExpand
The incentive effects of litigation fee shifting when legal standards are uncertain
Abstract In recent years, various commentators have argued that adopting the British rule for litigation costs, which requires the losing party to pay the winner's reasonable legal expenses, wouldExpand
Improving Settlement Devices: Rule 68 and beyond
Existing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 and many parallel state court rules mandate that defendants collect postoffer court costs, but usually not attorneys' fees, from the plaintiff if the refused offer is not improved on at trial. Expand
Judicial decisionmaking and litigation expenditure
Recent years have borne witness to a striking increase in expenditures on legal services.’ Various critics of the U.S. legal system have accordingly argued that amounts currently spent on or inExpand
An Economic Analysis of Rule 68
  • G. Miller
  • Economics
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
  • 1986
RULE 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a plaintiff who refuses a defendant's formal settlement offer and then obtains a judgment not more favorable than the offer must pay theExpand
Pretrial bargaining behavior within the shadow of the law: Theory and experimental evidence
When dispute arises from a consensual relationship, two possible outcomes can occur. Pretrial bargaining may result in an out of court settlement, or if the bargaining process breaks down, theExpand
A Systemic Approach to Comparative Law: The Effect of Cost, Fee, and Financing Rules on the Development of the Substantive Law
IN this article I shall explore the hypothesis that certain systematic differences in substantive law among common-law jurisdictions can be explained in part by differences among the cost, fee, andExpand
One-Way Fee Shifting Statutes and Offer of Judgment Rules: An Experiment
Many federal statutes, most notably the Civil Rights Attorneys' Fees Awards Act ("? 1988"), make defendants liable for the attorneys' fees of prevailing plaintiffs. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68Expand
Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence
In contrast to the American rule, whereby each party bears its own costs, the English rule requires losers at trial to pay the winner's legal fees, up to a reasonable limit. We develop six hypothesesExpand
An Analysis of Fee Shifting Based on the Margin of Victory: On Frivolous Suits, Meritorious Suits, and the Role of Rule 11
When plaintiffs cannot predict the outcome of litigation with certainty, neither the American rule (each litigant bears its own litigation expenses) nor the British rule (the losing litigant pays theExpand