Increased pollinator habitat enhances cacao fruit set and predator conservation.

@article{Forbes2017IncreasedPH,
  title={Increased pollinator habitat enhances cacao fruit set and predator conservation.},
  author={Samantha J. Forbes and T. Northfield},
  journal={Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America},
  year={2017},
  volume={27 3},
  pages={
          887-899
        }
}
  • Samantha J. Forbes, T. Northfield
  • Published 2017
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
  • The unique benefits of wild pollinators to the productivity of agricultural crops have become increasingly recognized in recent decades. [...] Key Result The addition of cacao fruit husks increased the number of fruits per tree and along with hand pollination treatments, increased final yields indicating a promotion of the pollination ecosystem service provided by the specialist pollinators, midges. We also found that cacao fruit husk addition increased the densities of two predator groups, spiders and skinks…Expand Abstract
    19 Citations

    Figures and Topics from this paper.

    Weaver Ants Provide Ecosystem Services to Tropical Tree Crops
    • 7
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 90 REFERENCES
    Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services
    • 269
    • PDF
    Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?
    • 922
    • PDF
    Habitat restoration promotes pollinator persistence and colonization in intensively managed agriculture.
    • 86
    • PDF
    Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields
    • 74
    • PDF
    Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
    • 440
    • PDF
    Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance
    • 1,306
    • PDF
    Comparison of pollinators and natural enemies: a meta‐analysis of landscape and local effects on abundance and richness in crops
    • 156
    • PDF