In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning

  title={In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning},
  author={Jonathan Evans},
  journal={Trends in Cognitive Sciences},
  • Jonathan Evans
  • Published 1 October 2003
  • Psychology, Biology
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Figures from this paper

Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

This article reviews a diverse set of proposals for dual processing in higher cognition within largely disconnected literatures in cognitive and social psychology and suggests that while some dual-process theories are concerned with parallel competing processes involving explicit and implicit knowledge systems, others are concerns with the influence of preconscious processes that contextualize and shape deliberative reasoning and decision-making.

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

  • Jonathan EvansK. Stanovich
  • Psychology, Biology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2013
It is argued that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science.

The Embodied Embedded Character of System 1 Processing

It is argued that it is essential for System 1 processing to be comprehended in an Embodied Embedded approach to Cognition to avoid paradoxes in empirical results of studies mainly on reasoning.

Fractionating the System of Deductive Reasoning

In this chapter I suggest that the best way to advance our understanding of the neural basis of reasoning is to put equal emphasis on cognitive theory and neuropsychological data and ideas. This

Dual Processing in Reasoning

Human reasoning has been characterized as an interplay between an automatic belief-based system and a demanding logic-based reasoning system. The present study tested a fundamental claim about the

The Interplay Among Knowledge, Cognitive Abilities and Thinking Styles in Probabilistic Reasoning: A Test of a Model

Stanovich et al. (Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 36, 251–285, 2008) outlined how people can reach a correct solution when a task besides the normative solution elicits competing response options that are

Anatomy of deductive reasoning

  • V. Goel
  • Psychology, Biology
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2007

Reasoning with complementary pathways , not competing processes

The core of our argument is that the human mental architecture is composed of nine subsystems of equal status that interact as parts of a coherent overall system, and therefore one mind. Two of these

Reasoning with complementary pathways, not competing processes

The core of our argument is that the human mental architecture is composed of nine subsystems of equal status that interact as parts of a coherent overall system, and therefore one mind. Two of these



Dissociation of Mechanisms Underlying Syllogistic Reasoning

It is concluded that syllogistic reasoning is implemented in two distinct systems whose engagement is primarily a function of the presence or absence of semantic content.

The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.

Distinctions have been proposed between systems of reasoning for centuries. This article distills properties shared by many of these distinctions and characterizes the resulting systems in light of

Shifting from the Perceptual Brain to the Logical Brain: The Neural Impact of Cognitive Inhibition Training

Abstract What happens in the human brain when the mind has to inhibit a perceptual process in order to activate a logical reasoning process? Here, we use functional imaging to show the networks of

Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis

  • R. Samuels
  • Psychology
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1998
In recent years evolutionary psychologists have developed and defended the Massive Modularity Hypothesis, which maintains that our cognitive architecture—including the part that subserves ‘central

Evolution and the Psychology of Thinking: The Debate

D.E. Over, Introduction: The Evolutionary Psychology of Thinking. G.L. Brase, The Allocation System: Using Signal Detection Processes to Regulate Representations in a Multi-modular Mind. L. Fiddick,

Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.

It is suggested that the methods used for studying reasoning be reviewed, especially the instructional context, which necessarily defines pragmatic influences as biases.

Working memory and reasoning: An individual differences perspective

This article reports three experiments that investigated the relationship between working memory capacity and syllogistic and five-term series spatial inference. A series of complex and simple verbal

Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief

The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?

  • A. Baddeley
  • Biology, Psychology
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2000

Working memory and bias in reasoning across the life span.

Age differences in syllogistic reasoning in relation to crystallized and fluid ability were studied in 278 adults and a significant bias was found toward acceptance of invalid syllogisms as valid, even when contents were abstract.