In the eye of the beholder: Reply to Wilson and Shadish (2006) and Radin,

Abstract

Our meta-analysis, which demonstrated (i) a small, but highly significant overall effect, (ii) a small study effect, and (iii) extreme heterogeneity, has provoked widely differing responses. After considering our respondents’ concerns about the possible effects of psychological moderator variables, the potential for missing data, and the difficulties… (More)

Topics

1 Figure or Table

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Nelson2006InTE, title={In the eye of the beholder: Reply to Wilson and Shadish (2006) and Radin,}, author={T Nelson and Dobyns and Fiona Steinkamp and Emil Boller}, year={2006} }