In search of transfer following cued recall practice: The case of process-based biology concepts

  title={In search of transfer following cued recall practice: The case of process-based biology concepts},
  author={Steven C. Pan and Sarah A. Hutter and Dominic D'Andrea and Daanish Unwalla and Timothy C. Rickard},
  journal={Applied Cognitive Psychology},
Appl Cognit Psychol. 2019;1–17. Summary Previous work has demonstrated that cued recall of a term from a fact yields learning that does not transfer, relative to a restudy control, to recall of another term from the same fact. Here we report six experiments in which a series of manipulations during the initial study and training phases of learning, hypothesized to increase transfer for process‐based biology concepts, were investigated. In Experiments 1 and 2, fill‐ in‐the‐blank questions… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall
The pretesting paradigm is addressed, in which there is no study opportunity prior to cued recall testing, and hence retrieval occurs through semantic memory, and the results of two experiments supported the latter hypothesis.
Retrieval practice transfer effects for multielement event triplets
Retrieval practice (RP) leads to improved retention relative to re-exposure and is considered a robust phenomenon when the final test conditions are identical to RP conditions. However, the extent to
Test-enhanced learning for pairs and triplets: When and why does transfer occur?
The majority of the results can be explained by combining the dual-memory theory of the testing effect with an inclusive-OR representation that forms when two or more cues are presented on the training test.
Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice.
Pretesting is highly competitive with posttesting and can yield similar, if not greater, pedagogical benefits, which have important implications for the incorporation of practice tests in education and training contexts.
Online and Clicker Quizzing on Jargon Terms Enhances Definition-Focused but Not Conceptually Focused Biology Exam Performance
It is demonstrated that a brief and easily implemented jargon-quizzing intervention, deliverable via Internet or in-class platforms, can yield substantial improvements in students’ course-relevant scientific lexica, but does not necessarily impact conceptual learning.
Does Spelling Still Matter—and If So, How Should It Be Taught? Perspectives from Contemporary and Historical Research
A century ago, spelling skills were highly valued and widely taught in schools using traditional methods, such as weekly lists, drill exercises, and low- and high-stakes spelling tests. That approach
Case Study: Learning Difficulties of Qualitative Research Methodology at Biology Education Postgraduate
Qualitative research methodology courses become a provision for postgraduate students to carry out research, as one of the three obligations of college. The course is a new subject and most students
How do college students use digital flashcards during self-regulated learning?
Over the past two decades, digital flashcards - that is, computer programmes, smartphone apps, and online services that mimic, and potentially improve upon, the capabilities of traditional paper


Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning: Meta-Analytic Review and Synthesis
The findings of the first comprehensive meta-analytic review into testing yield learning that transfers to different contexts motivate a three-factor framework for transfer of test-enhanced learning and have practical implications for the effective use of practice testing in educational and other training contexts.
Retrieval Practice Benefits Deductive Inference
Retrieval practice has been shown to benefit learning. However, the benefit has sometimes been attenuated with more complex materials that require integrating multiple units of information.
Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests
The results suggest that scope or type of processing required during retrieval practice is likely a critical factor in whether testing will have specific or robust benefits.
Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?
On the basis of the overall patterns of durability and efficiency, the prescriptive conclusion for students is to practice recalling concepts to an initial criterion of 3 correct recalls and then to relearn them 3 times at widely spaced intervals.
Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?
Cross-experiment analyses indicated that test-enhanced learning is not diminished when two or three cue combinations are presented during training, and testing on all possible stimulus–response combinations remains the most efficient strategy for the learning of triple associates.
Explanation Feedback Is Better Than Correct Answer Feedback for Promoting Transfer of Learning
Among the many factors that influence the efficacy of feedback on learning, the information contained in the feedback message is arguably the most important. One common assumption is that there is a
Testing with Feedback Yields Potent, but Piecewise, Learning of History and Biology Facts.
Does correctly answering a test question about a multiterm fact enhance memory for the entire fact? We explored that issue in 4 experiments. Subjects first studied Advanced Placement History or
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Meta-analysis uses meta-analysis to examine the effects of testing versus restudy on retention and indicates support for the role of effortful processing as a contributor to the testing effect.
Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.
Three experiments examined how taking an initial test affects later memory for prose materials not initially tested, showing that testing enhanced recall 24 hr later for the initially nontested material.