In defense of teaching structured COBOL as computer science: (or, notes on being sage struck)

@article{Tompkins1983InDO,
  title={In defense of teaching structured COBOL as computer science: (or, notes on being sage struck)},
  author={H. Tompkins},
  journal={ACM SIGPLAN Notices},
  year={1983},
  volume={18},
  pages={86-94}
}
  • H. Tompkins
  • Published 1983
  • Computer Science
  • ACM SIGPLAN Notices
  • Sometimes we discover unpleasant articles which make highly controversial assertions that are potentially damaging to our colleagues, our ideals, and our students. [i] When such articles are written by evident lightweights, we go on about the day's business. However, when such articles are written by an acknowledged sage and successful revolutionary of our profession, we are in difficulties. Suppressing our dissent is professionally dishonest, so dissent we must, even if the current "in" group… CONTINUE READING
    7 Citations
    Fighting the disease: more comments after Dijkstra and Tompking
    • 3
    The Relationship Between COBOL and Computer Science
    • 7
    • PDF
    A note on H.E. Tompkins's minimum-period COBOL style
    • 2
    Control Structures: Selection
    What is programming really all about?
    Control Structures: Iteration

    References

    Interactive Files
    • PASCAL~ (TM) User's Reference Manual, SORCIM