In Defense of HARKing

@article{Vancouver2018InDO,
  title={In Defense of HARKing},
  author={Jeffrey B. Vancouver},
  journal={Industrial and Organizational Psychology},
  year={2018},
  volume={11},
  pages={73 - 80}
}
  • J. B. Vancouver
  • Published 1 March 2018
  • Psychology
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Science is a complex task. It involves the creation and dissemination of knowledge. The creation of knowledge requires identifying and abstracting patterns (i.e., identifying phenomena and theorizing about the processes that bring it about), as well as systematically observing to better see and quantify the patterns (e.g., effect size estimating) or assess the validity of the abstractions used to explain the patterns (i.e., theory testing). To help (a) hone in on what observations would be… 

Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?

  • Mark Rubin
  • Business
    The Quantitative Methods for Psychology
  • 2020
Preregistration entails researchers registering their planned research hypotheses, methods, and analyses in a time-stamped document before they undertake their data collection and analyses. This

The Costs of HARKing

  • Mark Rubin
  • Psychology
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2022
Kerr ([1998]) coined the term ‘HARKing’ to refer to the practice of ‘hypothesizing after the results are known’. This questionable research practice has received increased attention in recent years

Employees’ Improvisational Behavior: Exploring the Role of Leader Grit and Humility

ABSTRACT In spite of a growing interest for improvisation in organizations, the microfoundations of improvisation have not been theorized yet. Exploring these microfoundations, we study how

Latent Change Score Models for the Study of Development and Dynamics in Organizational Research

The empirical study of change has proven to be one of the most vexing challenges in organizational science. Fortunately, contemporary methodologies originating from developmental psychology may

Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests

Preregistration has been proposed as a useful method for making a publicly verifiable distinction between confirma- tory hypothesis tests, which involve planned tests of ante hoc hypotheses, and

Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science

A HARK-solid, reproducible inference framework suitable for big data, based on models that represent formalization of hypotheses is proposed, which underpins ‘natural selection’ in a knowledge base maintained by the scientific community.

Universal research ethics and international business studies

  • D. Arnold
  • Business
    Journal of International Business Studies
  • 2021
Research ethics have received comprehensive institutional attention at least since the creation of the U.S. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research in 1989. Over the last

Catching Gazelles with a Lasso: Big data techniques for the prediction of high-growth firms

We investigate whether our limited ability to predict high-growth firms (HGF) is because previous research has used a restricted set of explanatory variables, and in particular because there is a

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES

HARKing : Hypothesizing After the Results are Known

  • L.
  • Psychology
  • 2002
This article considers a practice in scientific communication termed HARKing (Hypothesizing After the Results are Known). HARKing is defined as presenting a post hoc hypothesis (i.e., one based on or

Improving I-O Science Through Synthetic Validity

The purpose of this comment is to advocate for the development of a synthetic validity database along the lines described by Johnson et al. (2010), not only because of its practical utility but also

HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta‐Analytic Sources

We assessed presumed consequences of hypothesizing after results are known (HARKing) by contrasting hypothesized versus nonhypothesized effect sizes among 10 common relations in organizational

A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology

Credibility and trustworthiness are the bedrock upon which any science is built. The strength of these foundations has been increasingly questioned across the sciences as instances of research

Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

It is found that the percentage of respondents who have engaged in questionable practices was surprisingly high, which suggests that some questionable practices may constitute the prevailing research norm.

Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data

  • Journal of Management,
  • 2017