Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

@article{Moher1999ImprovingTQ,
  title={Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement},
  author={David Moher and Deborah J. Cook and Susan Eastwood and Ingram Olkin and Drummond Rennie and Donna F. Stroup},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={1999},
  volume={354},
  pages={1896-1900}
}
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
TLDR
The revised CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
TLDR
The revised CONSORT statement presented in this paper incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
TLDR
The revised CONSORT statement presented in this paper incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
  • D. Turpin
  • Medicine
    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
  • 2005
The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review
TLDR
Although there has been an improvement in the quality of meta-analyses in diagnostic research, there are still many deficiencies in the reporting which future reviewers need to address if readers are to trust the validity of the reported findings.
Do health technology assessments comply with QUOROM diagram guidance? An empirical study
TLDR
Compliance with the recommendations of the QUOROM statement is not universal in systematic reviews or meta-analyses; flow diagrams make the conduct of study selection transparent only if the relationship between citations and studies is clearly expressed.
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
TLDR
The use of CONSORT does indeed help to improve the quality of reports of RCTs and is enhanced by continuous monitoring of the biomedical literature; this monitoring allows CONSORT to be modified depending on the merits of maintaining or dropping current items and including new items.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES
A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group.
A RANDOMIZED controlled trial (RCT) is the most reliable method of assessing the efficacy of health care interventions.1,2Reports of RCTs should provide readers with adequate information about what
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
TLDR
It is concluded that an urgent need exists for improved methods in literature searching, quality evaluation of trials, and synthesizing of the results.
Meta-analysis in clinical research.
TLDR
Important design and statistical issues of this process of combining study results that can be used to draw conclusions about therapeutic effectiveness or to plan new studies are reviewed.
Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
TLDR
The outcomes of the 12 large randomized, controlled trials that were studied were not predicted accurately 35 percent of the time by the meta-analyses published previously on the same topics.
Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies.
TLDR
While inclusion of unpublished data in scientific overviews remains controversial, most investigators directly involved in meta-analysis believe that unpublished data should not be systematically excluded.
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study
TLDR
There is no evidence of the impact of duplicate data on meta-analysis, and 17% of systematically searched randomised trials of ondansetron as a postoperative antiemetic were covert duplicates and resulted in 28% of patient data being duplicated.
Meta-analysis: an update.
TLDR
The quality of meta-analyses of randomized control trial reports in the english language literature was evaluated using a scoring method that lists 23 items in six major areas: study design, combinability, control of bias, statistical analysis, sensitivity analysis, and application of results.
...
...