Improvement of semi-quantitative small-animal PET data with recovery coefficients: a phantom and rat study.

Abstract

AIM To evaluate the accuracy of semi-quantitative small-animal PET data, uncorrected for attenuation, and then of the same semi-quantitative data corrected by means of recovery coefficients (RCs) based on phantom studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A phantom containing six fillable spheres (diameter range: 4.4-14 mm) was filled with an 18F-FDG solution (spheres/background activity=10.1, 5.1 and 2.5). RCs, defined as measured activity/expected activity, were calculated. Nude rats harbouring tumours (n=50) were imaged after injection of 18F-FDG and sacrificed. The standardized uptake value (SUV) in tumours was determined with small-animal PET and compared to ex-vivo counting (ex-vivo SUV). Small-animal PET SUVs were corrected with RCs based on the greatest tumour diameter. Tumour proliferation was assessed with cyclin A immunostaining and correlated to the SUV. RESULTS RCs ranged from 0.33 for the smallest sphere to 0.72 for the largest. A sigmoidal correlation was found between RCs and sphere diameters (r(2)=0.99). Small-animal PET SUVs were well correlated with ex-vivo SUVs (y=0.48x-0.2; r(2)=0.71) and the use of RCs based on the greatest tumour diameter significantly improved regression (y=0.84x-0.81; r(2)=0.77), except for tumours with important necrosis. Similar results were obtained without sacrificing animals, by using PET images to estimate tumour dimensions. RC-based corrections improved correlation between small-animal PET SUVs and tumour proliferation (uncorrected data: Rho=0.79; corrected data: Rho=0.83). CONCLUSION Recovery correction significantly improves both accuracy of small-animal PET semi-quantitative data in rat studies and their correlation with tumour proliferation, except for largely necrotic tumours.

Statistics

05020072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

88 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 88 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Aide2007ImprovementOS, title={Improvement of semi-quantitative small-animal PET data with recovery coefficients: a phantom and rat study.}, author={Nicolas Aide and Marie-h{\'e}l{\`e}ne Louis and S Hamilton - Dutoit and Alexandre Labiche and Edwige Lemoisson and M{\'e}lanie Briand and Val{\'e}rie Nataf and Laurent Poulain and Pascal Gauduchon and Jean-no{\"{e}l Talbot and Françoise Montravers}, journal={Nuclear medicine communications}, year={2007}, volume={28 10}, pages={813-22} }